We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that dates on the Forum are not currently showing correctly. Please bear with us while we get this fixed, and see Site feedback for updates.
Claim from 'at fault' car accident party's insurance company
A car accident that happened on 18th Feb 2020 where I was at no fault (in stationary traffic when hit from behind) and my insurance company has since that date confirmed the case closed by letter at the end of that year (2020).
However, today, the company that provided a replacement vehicle while mine was being repaired contacted me with a series of questions for which they expect answers for their lawyers as the party at fault solicitors are questioning the choice of vehicle I was given.
The gist of this is regarding the vehicle provided: such as, did I need that specification?, was I offered a choice? etc. The recollection from my call was that I asked when reporting this accident if I simply asked if I
would get a similar vehicle (hybrid/automatic) and they confirmed that a similar specification vehicle would be provided.
would get a similar vehicle (hybrid/automatic) and they confirmed that a similar specification vehicle would be provided.
I have all the paperwork from the car hire company and it shows £0.00 cost to me.
My concern is regarding speaking or communicating with the hire company when the dispute is between them and the at fault party insurance company.
Any thoughts please?
Thanks.
Any thoughts please?
Thanks.
0
Comments
-
If your insurance company dealt with it all, I would direct the car hire company put all correspondence though them.
Let's Be Careful Out There1 -
Refer them to the insurance company. DO NOT enter into any other correspondence.
1 -
This isn't unusual questioning, you are expected to mitigate your costs, and the use of credit hire is often queried. As stated, pass them on to your insurer at the time of the incident. You may (unlikely) have to give evidence possibly even in court to give evidence of the requirement. Your insurer's legal team would advise you if this is necessary.1
-
HillStreetBlues said:If your insurance company dealt with it all, I would direct the car hire company put all correspondence though them.Grey_Critic said:Refer them to the insurance company. DO NOT enter into any other correspondence.ianG said:My concern is regarding speaking or communicating with the hire company when the dispute is between them and the at fault party insurance company.
Any thoughts please?
It sounds like the third party insurers are saying you didnt fulfill your legal obligation to reasonably mitigate your losses. This will typically cover saying that you've hired a £200 a day car, could you have lived with a more basic model, smaller car etc for £100/day instead? Credit hire can be double the price of a hire car (or more) and so they'll also challenge if you had to take the car on credit rather than afford to pay it for yourself. There can also be a dispute on the period you had it, at times drivable cars are taken in for inspection and then sit there for 6 weeks whilst parts are ordered all the time you're in a £200/day car whereas you could have continued to use your damaged car until the parts were ready.
If you do support the credit hire company then in almost all cases, other than fraud, if they dont recover the whole amount the shortfall is written off.2 -
DullGreyGuy said:HillStreetBlues said:If your insurance company dealt with it all, I would direct the car hire company put all correspondence though them.Grey_Critic said:Refer them to the insurance company. DO NOT enter into any other correspondence.ianG said:My concern is regarding speaking or communicating with the hire company when the dispute is between them and the at fault party insurance company.
Any thoughts please?
It sounds like the third party insurers are saying you didnt fulfill your legal obligation to reasonably mitigate your losses. This will typically cover saying that you've hired a £200 a day car, could you have lived with a more basic model, smaller car etc for £100/day instead? Credit hire can be double the price of a hire car (or more) and so they'll also challenge if you had to take the car on credit rather than afford to pay it for yourself. There can also be a dispute on the period you had it, at times drivable cars are taken in for inspection and then sit there for 6 weeks whilst parts are ordered all the time you're in a £200/day car whereas you could have continued to use your damaged car until the parts were ready.
If you do support the credit hire company then in almost all cases, other than fraud, if they dont recover the whole amount the shortfall is written off.0 -
Thanks for those points. The car hire co billed to 'ABI Non-fault', which left my agreement at £0.00. But I appreciate your last para explaining where this is coming from.
They are presumably making some reference to the ABI GTA on credit hire, you can read more about it on the linked site above.
The bill would have been to the at fault party's insurer, if both the hire card company and the insurer are signed up to the GTA it avoids arguments over rates etc but doesnt automatically mean it has to be paid without question.1 -
Wouldn't be surprised if the accident repair place is using a car hire company as the insurance middle man. I did this and it meant my insurance company wasn't involved as the hire company did the chasing, took a £300 fee for the privilege and loaned a very expensive car to me for months, all billed to the at fault party. Turned a £350 bill into a 10k one.
0 -
Stateofart said:Wouldn't be surprised if the accident repair place is using a car hire company as the insurance middle man. I did this and it meant my insurance company wasn't involved as the hire company did the chasing, took a £300 fee for the privilege and loaned a very expensive car to me for months, all billed to the at fault party. Turned a £350 bill into a 10k one.0
-
I had a rear-end shunt about 3 years ago, my insurance company initially put a hire car company in touch with me to provide a vehicle whilst mine was being fixed, I thought "that's great and the car they're offering is brand new and much nicer than my own so why not if the at fault's insurance company has to stump up for the bill?"
After receiving the hire car I read all the paperwork and to my horror found that I'd be on the hook if the insurer refused to pay or the hire company failed to recover their costs in full or in part.
I subsequently found out the hire company was planning to bill the insurer a huge amount for this vehicle which scared me to death so I had it picked up and the contract cancelled. I called the at fault's insurer who then put their own, approved hire car company in touch to supply a courtesy car. I think this almost seems like a racket - the hire company can't fail to win but insurers do seem to be on to them, just my opinion though. Hope the OP gets it sorted.4 -
jlfrs01 said:I had a rear-end shunt about 3 years ago, my insurance company initially put a hire car company in touch with me to provide a vehicle whilst mine was being fixed, I thought "that's great and the car they're offering is brand new and much nicer than my own so why not if the at fault's insurance company has to stump up for the bill?"
After receiving the hire car I read all the paperwork and to my horror found that I'd be on the hook if the insurer refused to pay or the hire company failed to recover their costs in full or in part.
I subsequently found out the hire company was planning to bill the insurer a huge amount for this vehicle which scared me to death so I had it picked up and the contract cancelled. I called the at fault's insurer who then put their own, approved hire car company in touch to supply a courtesy car. I think this almost seems like a racket - the hire company can't fail to win but insurers do seem to be on to them, just my opinion though. Hope the OP gets it sorted.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 348.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.4K Spending & Discounts
- 240.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 617.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.7K Life & Family
- 254.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards