We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Got a mortgage? Make sure you pay attention!!
Comments
-
LHW99 said:tooldle said:I didn’t think it was possible to have interest only ( no repayment vehicle) all those years ago. Even in the 90’s evidence of a repayment vehicle was required for an interest only option. If my memory serves correctly interest only without a repayment vehicle became common in the 2000’s.There were interest only mortgages being sold with endowment policies / unit linked investments in the 1980's. However, when endowments began missing targets, many people sold them / made them paid up, or gave up with the unit-linked policies.That left interest only morgages which either had no repayment vehicle.Also where the policies / investments only paid a part of the debt after 25 years, the outstanding amount remained as a debt with the lender.Presumably this happened, and the couple hadn't realised that the rest of the debt remained as interest only, rather than ensuring it went onto a repayment basis.0
-
Lots of people aren't interested in their mortgages (present company excepted) and have no idea what their payments are for.
0 -
Typical 'scare the pants off old folk' story from a rag notorious for it.As our founder states, “My hope is that with a 40-year property, its house price would have gone up many many many more times than the mortgage is worth, so hopefully the mortgage will be relatively small compared to what the house is worth."Under 40 years ago, we bought a semi for £70k, and similar ones are currently selling for around £600-650k.Of course these 'unfortunate' folk might live somewhere less salubrious, but the price paid initially will no doubt reflect that too.One benefit of being a 'conspiracy theorist' is having slug pellets that work.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards