We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Reviewing My S&Ss Account

Hi All,

In 2022 I setup a S&Ss ISA account with Vanguard - namely a LifeStrategy 100% Equity Fund - Accumulation. 

I pay in £200 per month, the overall value is £2500 and the personal rate of return is +6.35%.

I never fully understood what any of this means or even if it's the best option for me. Can anyone help and advise?

Thanks in advance. 
«1

Comments

  • Frequentlyhere
    Frequentlyhere Posts: 357 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 10 June 2023 at 9:42AM
    How do you expect us to tell you whether what you're doing is personally best for you if you've told us literally nothing at all about your personal circumstances? 

    e.g.  Are you young/old? How long a term investment do you want, and for what purpose? What's your risk tolerance? What are your hopes/expectations for this investment?  etc etc.

  • MX5huggy
    MX5huggy Posts: 7,173 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It’s a perfectly reasonable thing to have done. You could do weeks of research and end up with exactly the same outcome. Keep putting your £200 in maybe increase it and over the next 10 to 20 years you should have a good outcome. 
  • Sg28
    Sg28 Posts: 461 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    A stock and shares ISA with that fund is a perfectly good and sensible choice for a long term investment. 

    Depending on your circumstances and aims it might be better to us a SIPP instead if you dont mind locking that money away until 57. 
    Ex Sg27 (long forgotten log in details)

    Massive thank you to those on the long since defunct Matched Betting board.
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,330 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    edited 10 June 2023 at 10:55AM
    JPin said:
    Hi All,

    In 2022 I setup a S&Ss ISA account with Vanguard - namely a LifeStrategy 100% Equity Fund - Accumulation. 

    I pay in £200 per month, the overall value is £2500 and the personal rate of return is +6.35%.

    I never fully understood what any of this means or even if it's the best option for me. Can anyone help and advise?

    Thanks in advance. 
    VLS100 at Vanguard would be a good strategy for some but not for others however we know nothing of you, your circumstances or objectives
    What is it that you don't understand? The Vanguard Investor platform? The VLS100 fund that you selected? Something else?
  • Eyeful
    Eyeful Posts: 1,261 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 10 June 2023 at 1:25PM
    1. One of the first rules is " never put your money into something you do not understand". So how come to ended up with putting money into that VLS fund? 

    2. You are not clear in stating what you do not understand the meaning off and no one here knows what your personal circumstances or aims are, you are unlikely to get any helpful suggestions.

    3. Maybe these video's by James Shack  (starting with the Vanguard  LifeStrategy  Fund) may be of some help to you.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGQ9KyQq8Jw

  • Eyeful
    Eyeful Posts: 1,261 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Does this help for meaning of Personal Rate of Return?

    https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rateofreturn.asp
  • boingy
    boingy Posts: 2,017 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    JPin said:
    Hi All,

    In 2022 I setup a S&Ss ISA account with Vanguard - namely a LifeStrategy 100% Equity Fund - Accumulation. 

    I pay in £200 per month, the overall value is £2500 and the personal rate of return is +6.35%.

    I never fully understood what any of this means or even if it's the best option for me. Can anyone help and advise?

    Thanks in advance. 
    I can't possibly tell you whether that's the best option for you but, in my view, you've made a pretty good start with your choice of fund and your investment level. The important thing is to keep paying into it and just let it grow over the years. Investing doesn't have to be complicated. If you can put in more money then do so but also balance it with things like pension and mortgage.

  • JPin
    JPin Posts: 188 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks to everyone who responded.

    Apologies for the vagueness of my original post, from the replies I have received I have done some research on what I have and I continue to keep this going. 

    I am 39 and this is something I setup to give me a good return in future life - hopefully around mid-50s. As I was late to investing I opted for the high risk strategy of 100% equity, however, as the years go on I will hope to dial this down to include bonds, I assume this is possible and if so are there any ramifications to my overall portfolio? 
  • InvesterJones
    InvesterJones Posts: 1,644 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    JPin said:
     I assume this is possible and if so are there any ramifications to my overall portfolio? 

    Yes and yes - the ramifications are that you'll have more bonds and fewer equities :p That means the performance characteristics will change - on average bonds would lower volatility and overall return, making them more suitable for short-medium term timescales, but that's not guaranteed - bonds are a different type of asset and react to different things than equities. Bond funds add another layer of complexity as now it's the price of the bond (it's worth to someone else) that's usually key rather than just the underlying yield. But as you're researching you'll be able to research this in plenty of time :)
  • JPin
    JPin Posts: 188 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    JPin said:
     I assume this is possible and if so are there any ramifications to my overall portfolio? 

    Yes and yes - the ramifications are that you'll have more bonds and fewer equities :p That means the performance characteristics will change - on average bonds would lower volatility and overall return, making them more suitable for short-medium term timescales, but that's not guaranteed - bonds are a different type of asset and react to different things than equities. Bond funds add another layer of complexity as now it's the price of the bond (it's worth to someone else) that's usually key rather than just the underlying yield. But as you're researching you'll be able to research this in plenty of time :)
    Bonds are a little more stable and better suited to portfolios closer to retirement etc?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.