We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BBC: Where property prices are set by what local people earn
Comments
-
BobT36 said:housebuyer143 said:MobileSaver said:Yellowsub2000 said:If mortgage is set by 3.5X earnings then house prices need to get back down to there tooOver a million people in the UK manage to buy a property every single year, even in the current climate.So the obvious answer for those complaining they can't afford to buy is for them to either buy something cheaper or instead better themselves to improve their earnings. Why should the rest of us be brought down to the lowest common denominator?
It's called a ladder for a reason and people need to have realistic expectations when buying their first place if they don't have the money to buy what they are dreaming of.
If we ignore the south east it is very possible to get on the housing ladder if people set their sights a little smaller initially.
Guess what happens when no-one is having kids anymore as they can't get anything better than a 1 bed flat in dangerous areas... No more pensions being paid for current retirees!
That, or even more mass immigration.
FTBers are no longer 19 year olds wanting to get their first foot on the property ladder and happy with a small 1-2 bed flat/terrace..
Someone in a 2 bed could easily fit two kids and two adults but they don't want to and so they complain how they can't afford to buy anywhere when in reality they could afford to if they either comprised on area or bought something smaller. Why can't a 34 year old buy a 2 bed flat?
Everyone I know and worked with managed to buy a house in their 20s. Some bought in the city but went for 2 beds, the others moved 30 mins out and bought 3 beds for the same price. You make compromises until you can get into the house you want in the area you want - most people can't buy their dream home right off the bat.
2 -
[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:Yellowsub2000 said:If mortgage is set by 3.5X earnings then house prices need to get back down to there tooOver a million people in the UK manage to buy a property every single year, even in the current climate.So the obvious answer for those complaining they can't afford to buy is for them to either buy something cheaper or instead better themselves to improve their earnings. Why should the rest of us be brought down to the lowest common denominator?Young people have far more opportunities and a much easier and more comfortable life than their parents and grandparents ever had.I find it really sad that some people just focus on high house prices and ignore everything else when they could be appreciating all the incredible benefits and improvements introduced by the hard work, tenacity and inventiveness of previous generations.Up until the age of around 11 our home was one bedroom which was shared by us five children while our parents slept on a sofa bed in the lounge. Today's generation come on to this forum asking how they can get an extra bedroom because they have a newborn on the way, the sense of entitlement is palpable![Deleted User] said:nobody has to have 5 kids if they can't afford it.I don't remember going without anything; my parents fed us, clothed us and we had toys to play with.The difference is that there was no sense of entitlement to brand new clothes, brand new toys or a bedroom each. Clothes and toys (often second-hand already) were handed down to younger siblings while bunk beds allowed us to share a single room.My parents got married in the local church and the reception was in the local social club, not on a beach in the Maldives costing five figures. They drove an old car bought with cash not a brand new model on HP. Many people we knew lived in old two-up, two-down terraces regardless of how many kids they had, people just made do and didn't expect everything to be brand new and shiny.The fundamental problem is that the younger generation don't understand or care about any of this, they just see the previous generations living in nice houses in nice areas and want the same, completely overlooking that it took those people decades of earning a living to get where they are now.Thank you for yet again completely and utterly proving my point.We were kids and didn't know or care that you could have your own bedroom. We were properly housed; we had a roof over our heads and a warm and dry home to live in.The fact you are aghast that we shared a room says all anyone needs to know about how entitled some of the younger generation are.Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years0 -
MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:Yellowsub2000 said:If mortgage is set by 3.5X earnings then house prices need to get back down to there tooOver a million people in the UK manage to buy a property every single year, even in the current climate.So the obvious answer for those complaining they can't afford to buy is for them to either buy something cheaper or instead better themselves to improve their earnings. Why should the rest of us be brought down to the lowest common denominator?Young people have far more opportunities and a much easier and more comfortable life than their parents and grandparents ever had.I find it really sad that some people just focus on high house prices and ignore everything else when they could be appreciating all the incredible benefits and improvements introduced by the hard work, tenacity and inventiveness of previous generations.Up until the age of around 11 our home was one bedroom which was shared by us five children while our parents slept on a sofa bed in the lounge. Today's generation come on to this forum asking how they can get an extra bedroom because they have a newborn on the way, the sense of entitlement is palpable![Deleted User] said:nobody has to have 5 kids if they can't afford it.I don't remember going without anything; my parents fed us, clothed us and we had toys to play with.The difference is that there was no sense of entitlement to brand new clothes, brand new toys or a bedroom each. Clothes and toys (often second-hand already) were handed down to younger siblings while bunk beds allowed us to share a single room.My parents got married in the local church and the reception was in the local social club, not on a beach in the Maldives costing five figures. They drove an old car bought with cash not a brand new model on HP. Many people we knew lived in old two-up, two-down terraces regardless of how many kids they had, people just made do and didn't expect everything to be brand new and shiny.The fundamental problem is that the younger generation don't understand or care about any of this, they just see the previous generations living in nice houses in nice areas and want the same, completely overlooking that it took those people decades of earning a living to get where they are now.Thank you for yet again completely and utterly proving my point.We were kids and didn't know or care that you could have your own bedroom. We were properly housed; we had a roof over our heads and a warm and dry home to live in.The fact you are aghast that we shared a room says all anyone needs to know about how entitled some of the younger generation are.
We, as the supposed "adults in the room" should be looking forward on how to make the world a better place and schemes like this could be the start instead of just saying "Well I had it tough so deal with it".Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool.3 -
Sunsaru said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:Yellowsub2000 said:If mortgage is set by 3.5X earnings then house prices need to get back down to there tooOver a million people in the UK manage to buy a property every single year, even in the current climate.So the obvious answer for those complaining they can't afford to buy is for them to either buy something cheaper or instead better themselves to improve their earnings. Why should the rest of us be brought down to the lowest common denominator?Young people have far more opportunities and a much easier and more comfortable life than their parents and grandparents ever had.I find it really sad that some people just focus on high house prices and ignore everything else when they could be appreciating all the incredible benefits and improvements introduced by the hard work, tenacity and inventiveness of previous generations.Up until the age of around 11 our home was one bedroom which was shared by us five children while our parents slept on a sofa bed in the lounge. Today's generation come on to this forum asking how they can get an extra bedroom because they have a newborn on the way, the sense of entitlement is palpable![Deleted User] said:nobody has to have 5 kids if they can't afford it.I don't remember going without anything; my parents fed us, clothed us and we had toys to play with.The difference is that there was no sense of entitlement to brand new clothes, brand new toys or a bedroom each. Clothes and toys (often second-hand already) were handed down to younger siblings while bunk beds allowed us to share a single room.My parents got married in the local church and the reception was in the local social club, not on a beach in the Maldives costing five figures. They drove an old car bought with cash not a brand new model on HP. Many people we knew lived in old two-up, two-down terraces regardless of how many kids they had, people just made do and didn't expect everything to be brand new and shiny.The fundamental problem is that the younger generation don't understand or care about any of this, they just see the previous generations living in nice houses in nice areas and want the same, completely overlooking that it took those people decades of earning a living to get where they are now.Thank you for yet again completely and utterly proving my point.We were kids and didn't know or care that you could have your own bedroom. We were properly housed; we had a roof over our heads and a warm and dry home to live in.The fact you are aghast that we shared a room says all anyone needs to know about how entitled some of the younger generation are.
We, as the supposed "adults in the room" should be looking forward on how to make the world a better place and schemes like this could be the start instead of just saying "Well I had it tough so deal with it".
I think back fondly to a time where my every embarrassing moment was not captured on camera to be relived over and over (esp at school), where the internet was in its infancy and wasn't the depressing doom and gloom it is now, and the days where you learnt to entertain yourself because you didn't have a phone glued to your hand. It is no surprise mental illness is so high for kids now.
Every generation has it's challenges.1 -
MobileSaver said:[Deleted User] said:MobileSaver said:Yellowsub2000 said:If mortgage is set by 3.5X earnings then house prices need to get back down to there tooOver a million people in the UK manage to buy a property every single year, even in the current climate.So the obvious answer for those complaining they can't afford to buy is for them to either buy something cheaper or instead better themselves to improve their earnings. Why should the rest of us be brought down to the lowest common denominator?Young people have far more opportunities and a much easier and more comfortable life than their parents and grandparents ever had.I find it really sad that some people just focus on high house prices and ignore everything else when they could be appreciating all the incredible benefits and improvements introduced by the hard work, tenacity and inventiveness of previous generations.Up until the age of around 11 our home was one bedroom which was shared by us five children while our parents slept on a sofa bed in the lounge. Today's generation come on to this forum asking how they can get an extra bedroom because they have a newborn on the way, the sense of entitlement is palpable!1
-
grumiofoundation said:MobileSaver said:The fundamental problem is that the younger generation don't understand or care about any of this, they just see the previous generations living in nice houses in nice areas and want the same, completely overlooking that it took those people decades of earning a living to get where they are now.0
-
spoovy said:Many people on here seem to believe that there is a "natural limit" to house prices, as there is with bread or fuel, where society begins to unravel beyond a certain point. But this is not true. Having somewhere to live is a basic human necessity like bread or fuel; but owning property is not.
There is no upper limit to the differential between incomes and house prices for this reason. I see no reason why, say one hundred years from now, owning your own house won't be considered a rare luxury.0 -
current state of the world
Yours is a well intended post but this highlights the predicament. If you have the attitude that your daughter has it bad, this will surely permeate through to her. They are bombarded online and through news channels, education et al that everything is bad. The world is going to burn up. We can either heat or eat. I believe the modern term for it is gaslighting. To be born, in the UK in 2012/13 is one of the luckiest times and places to be born in human history (even as a female!). I wish we could start telling kids that they should take the (vast) opportunities that they do have, and how fortunate they really are.
And yes, it's not their fault that they are being gas lit. But, unfortunately, many mature adults (who should know better) encourage and ramp up the bitterness, often for political reasons. I did not grow up with the worry that at any time, a bomb could drop on my house. However, my parents and good educators did teach me what it was like for people who grew up without the opportunities I enjoyed. I never felt like the world owed me, I felt like I had to go out and get it.3 -
Altior said:current state of the world
Yours is a well intended post but this highlights the predicament. If you have the attitude that your daughter has it bad, this will surely permeate through to her. They are bombarded online and through news channels, education et al that everything is bad. The world is going to burn up. We can either heat or eat. I believe the modern term for it is gaslighting. To be born, in the UK in 2012/13 is one of the luckiest times and places to be born in human history (even as a female!). I wish we could start telling kids that they should take the (vast) opportunities that they do have, and how fortunate they really are.
And yes, it's not their fault that they are being gas lit. But, unfortunately, many mature adults (who should know better) encourage and ramp up the bitterness, often for political reasons. I did not grow up with the worry that at any time, a bomb could drop on my house. However, my parents and good educators did teach me what it was like for people who grew up without the opportunities I enjoyed. I never felt like the world owed me, I felt like I had to go out and get it.Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool.1 -
Yes Sunsaru, many thanks for clarifying and I did read it as well intended anyway, as I noted. However I feel it does show what the modern world is up against, in my opinion. The country is producing kids into adulthood who are pretty bitter, angry, and I do feel somewhat, entitled. There is no prospect in this situation being reversed. There's currency in clickbait and attention seeking, not so much in pragmatism.3
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards