We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Survey and potential costs?

I saw this thread which prompted this. :)

We had a Level 3 survey done for a 2-bed semi property we liked (built in 1935-1940) - it is well maintained however, there are some near future works according to the report:
The brickwork forming the two chimney stacks are showing signs of general weathering and the mortar between the bricks (called pointing) is starting to erode. As such, I would recommend that you budget for reporting the brickwork within the next 3 years.

And:

The roofline timbers are poorly decorated, and there is some evidence of the early stages of timber decay starting to occur particularly to the exposed edges. In the immediate term I would recommend that you budget for fully preparing the roofline timbers in readiness for redecoration, undertaking timber repairs as necessary to the decaying sections, then redecorating with a suitable primer, followed by one coat of a suitable external grade undercoat and two coats of a suitable external grade top coat.

The surveyor provided a cost guidance for the repair:
  • Repair mortar flaunting to chimney stacks: £400
  • Repoint brickwork to chimney stacks: £600
  • Repoint weathered ridge tiles: £1800
  • Fully prepared and redecorate external joinery: £1400
Should we negotiate our offer price? Our relatives are divided - some say these are not worth haggling over (bad vibes, backside covering, etc.), others say we should go back to the vendors.

There are other costs too like additional loft insulation (currently 100mm), clearing gutters, etc. but these are something we could potentially undertake ourselves.

Many thanks in advance!

Comments

  • I wouldn't bother, you are buying a house and at some point in time some maintenance will have to be carried out.
  • niceguyed
    niceguyed Posts: 328 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    If the roof is not new and you can see the roof then it is almost guaranteed those remedial works will be picked up in a survey. Hard to say with the roofing, would the vendor be amenable to you getting a quote as I wouldn't trust the survey figures. 

    As a vendor I'd be saying you can see the roof is not new and it's reflected in the price and I'd tell you to take a run and jump. Only you can decide if it is. 

    The chimney may be a source of unexpected repair if it's causing any damp issues. If not those survey findings are par for the course on a 1930s semi. 
  • mi-key
    mi-key Posts: 1,580 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The likely actual costs for that work is more like half what the surveyor has quoted. So really you are looking at about £2000. Its not worth messing the seller around for that much. 

    None of the work noted is urgent and things you can get round to when needed once you live there. Remember you are buying a house getting on for 100 years old, so you can expect some things to be aged and need repairs or replacement in the future. None of this benefits the seller though, so there is no reason they should pay for it 
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 18,828 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    This is all trivial routine maintenance / decoration. I wouldn’t be chipping away at the price.
  • Van_Girl
    Van_Girl Posts: 418 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I personally wouldn't negotiate on these items. It's expected maintenance in my mind. With my surveyors hat on, I'd advise much the same to my Client

    £12k in 25 #14 £19,041.66/£18k 24 #14 £15,653.11/£18k 23 #14 £17,195.80/£18k 22 #20 £23,024.86/£23k
      Debt Free January 2021
    • mi-key said:
      The likely actual costs for that work is more like half what the surveyor has quoted. So really you are looking at about £2000. Its not worth messing the seller around for that much. 
      Even at those costs, it's less than £5k. 

      I'd not bother and be glad if that's the only issue flagged as needing work in the foreseeable. 
      I'm not an early bird or a night owl; I’m some form of permanently exhausted pigeon.
    • Reassuring posts! Thank you all! :)
    • Agree with other posts, these seem trivial when you consider they could have found major structural issues any number of things which would have been far more costly and difficult to fix.

      Our chimney probably could do with repointing but in the grand scheme of things, we might get around to sorting it in 10 years time and even then, if it still looks ok I will just not bother.

      Houses need maintenance each year but if you go looking for problems which are not really there, you are going to be forever chasing your tail. Any 80 year old house is going to be 'weathering' to a point and its likely there will be lots of things which could do with some attention but ultimately you have to pick the priorities based on how much money you have to spend and to me, repointing a chimney which is only just starting to show signs of 'erroding' would be right down the list. 
    • Might it be cheaper to simply remove the chimney? Unless it's holding up the TV antenna then it's probably redundant.
    • Grizebeck
      Grizebeck Posts: 3,967 Forumite
      1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
      edited 24 January at 4:59PM
      Might it be cheaper to simply remove the chimney? Unless it's holding up the TV antenna then it's probably redundant.
      We did that when we re roofed
    Meet your Ambassadors

    🚀 Getting Started

    Hi new member!

    Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

    Categories

    • All Categories
    • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
    • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
    • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
    • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
    • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
    • 177.8K Life & Family
    • 259.9K Travel & Transport
    • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
    • 16K Discuss & Feedback
    • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

    Is this how you want to be seen?

    We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.