We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
How not to evict your tenant
Comments
-
That seems too lenient for the catalogue of errors on Mr Amjad Ali Khattak’s part. The tenant being forced to purchase old £1 coins to feed the meter….outrageous.2
-
One can only hope the publicity stops him from being able to rent out again, but I fear not._Penny_Dreadful said:That seems too lenient for the catalogue of errors on Mr Amjad Ali Khattak’s part. The tenant being forced to purchase old £1 coins to feed the meter….outrageous.0 -
The comments under the article are vaguely depressing...I'm not an early bird or a night owl; I’m some form of permanently exhausted pigeon.0
-
“ The council will be monitoring Mr Khattak’s compliance with legislation in the future and could add him to the national rogue landlords database.”Why are they not doing that now?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
Exactly. There’s no way he has a valid EICR certificate for this property and local authorities can impose financial penalties of up to £30,000 to those landlords who don’t have one. I’d hit him with the full £30,000!elsien said:“ The council will be monitoring Mr Khattak’s compliance with legislation in the future and could add him to the national rogue landlords database.”Why are they not doing that now?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards