We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
if no will but deceased parent wants to give property to children and wife right to live in property
With regard to owning rather than living, it's sort of moot the right to live there protects the mother long term and also preserves the asset for future generations.
What about preserving the asset for the current generation? It certainly is not moot. As previously discussed a life interest trust does not protect the mother as much as outright ownership. The OP has not indicated that there is any concrete threat to the ability to pass the asset down the family (such as the mother not being the children's biological parent or being incapable of handling money). Would you give all your own assets into a trust for your children and keep only a right to the income for your lifetime?
If the father owns the property in his sole name it would be a very good way to prevent the assets from being eaten away by care home fees at a later date
The OP has not given any indication that they are prepared to throw the mother into Overmydeadbody Grove in the hope that the taxpayer will boost the children's inheritance.