We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

IHT and the 'extra' exemption of the £175k 'uplift' - question please!

13»

Comments

  • bobster2
    bobster2 Posts: 1,059 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 18 April 2023 at 10:14AM
    CalJo99 said:
    Thank you for all the answers - I think I was worried that our 'normal' £325k exempt allowance HAD to be used first on a main home, and the main home also HAD to be applied to the £175k extra.

    Huh? This still sounds very confused. If you could just describe a hypothetical estate (value of main residence + value of other assets) - then someone can explain how it works for you.
    CalJo99 said:
    Still seems simpler though for the government just to have a flat rate £235+175 = £550k exemption. 
    You keep garbling this - it's 325 + 175 = 500
  • CalJo99
    CalJo99 Posts: 66 Forumite
    10 Posts
    ou keep garbling this - it's 325 + 175 = 500
    **

    So it is - a nice round figure!

    **

    Ok, if my main residence is worth £500k, and my second home is worth £300k, and I keep both, then I would assume (???) that when I peg out, then my standard £325k Nill rate band will be deducted against my main home, and so will the £175k - ie, that my main home will be 'IHT-free'. BUT that my second home, at £300k will be hit by the full 40% IHT bill.

    So far so easy (I think?) to understand.

    But, if I sell my (eg overlarge) main home, and downsize to a smaller, retirement home costing £300k (still keeping my second, holiday home), then how does the IHT play out? (Let's assume I blow the £200k CGT tax-free profit from selling my main home!).

    I now have two properties worth £300k each - total of £600k. So do I then get the same £325k + £175k = £500k IHT exemption, even though that is now spread across two properties, not just vested in my main residence? (I'd still have to pay 40% on the non-exempt residue of £100k?)




  • uknick
    uknick Posts: 1,792 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think you're over thinking this.

    If you die with 2 properties worth £300k each and no cash, as you suggest, then you have the following IHT liability;

    Main residence IHT liability is £300k less £175K leaving £125k which could be liable for IHT

    Add this £125k to the other property of £300k and you get an estate now valued at £425k

    Against this you have your £325k NRB, therefore you are left with £425k less £325k = £100k liable for IHT

    Or, a much easier way of doing it as your main residence is over the RNRB amount;

    Estate value at death £600k
    Less NRB of £500K
    Leaving £100k for IHT


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.