We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Buying: Title Plan and Title Deed has no Access Rights

2»

Comments

  • Dustyevsky
    Dustyevsky Posts: 3,104 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    It's fine not paying a solicitor if you can do the work yourself.
    Oddly enough, I've been in a disagreement with a body bound by a transfer deed of 1989. Thanks perhaps to others' carelessness, they and I had no copy of this deed. However, I assumed the contents of my title document (dated 1999) accurately summarised it.
    This was wrong. Now I've tracked-down the deed, there are two missing sentences which would be to the advantage of the other party, if only they could see them. Naturally, I'm saying nothing! As members of the body concerned aren't willing to spend money, and they seem to lack the skills I've used under guidance from a retired solicitor, it's unlikely they'll find out what I don't want them to know.

    Digital currency + social credit score + AI surveillance = lockdown.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.