📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Non earner - is paying my £2880 worth it?

Options
kipperman
kipperman Posts: 294 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
Having a bit of angst here and would appreciate some advice. I am 59 and a non earner from the tax point of view. 

Brief background - main income is from commercial property ( a rental income well into the realms of paying tax though not 40%), and therefore my wife's DC Pension and my SIPP ( of a value of around 420k)  hopefully will remain untouched for a long while if not for ever. Rental income split between the two of us, so both paying tax. Initially I thought paying my gross £3600 ( net £2880)  into the SIPP was a slam-dunk - but reading through here I realised that even though I would get my 20% from the government I would pay that back through tax should I draw anything down from the SIPP. Equally unlikely that I will need to/want to take my 25% tax free. So I am thinking that in my circumstances I would be just as well off  investing it next year  in a  Stocks and Shares ISA. I'm assuming that any (hopeful) gains will be tax free. 

Am I missing something though? Much appreciate any comments.
«13

Comments

  • MX5huggy
    MX5huggy Posts: 7,164 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You’re missing the 6.25% benefit of getting 25% added then taking 25% tax free then paying 20% tax on the rest. 

    costs you £2880 but you get out £3060. Plus if you leave it in the pension it’s sheltered from IHT. 
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,012 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    If you add £2880 to your SIPP, it will become £3600. Assuming no growth, if you withdraw it you will pay 15% tax, so you will receive £3060 - a profit of £180, compared to investing in a S&S ISA.
    If you do not withdraw it, it will not be included in any IHT calculations, so potentially could save you ( or your estate to be precise) 40% tax on it.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,181 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    The only benefit to you for going through the £3600 contribution loop would be the tax you save on the tax-free lump sum, ie 20% of £900=£180, so 6.25% return on your initial £2880, ignoring charges.

    Personally I cannot be bothered to do it as £180 over a year is pretty irrelevent to my and most other people's well-being.   Better to avoid the hassle and add the £2880 to your other investments.  Then devote the time to thinking about options with a greater payback in £ terms.


  • kipperman
    kipperman Posts: 294 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks for the input - probably the IHT implication is the most significant but I tend to agree with @Linton that it may well be more hassle than it's worth.  I'd rather not salt it away for the benefit of my progeny ( they are likely to benefit not unreasonably anyway): I think I'll hide it away from the taxman in a S&S ISA
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 14,536 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Linton said:
    The only benefit to you for going through the £3600 contribution loop would be the tax you save on the tax-free lump sum, ie 20% of £900=£180, so 6.25% return on your initial £2880, ignoring charges.

    Personally I cannot be bothered to do it as £180 over a year is pretty irrelevent to my and most other people's well-being.   


    Probably true of many people who frequent this forum, but for those on the breadline (and in many cases well below it), an extra £15 a month would mean a lot.
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • WYSPECIAL
    WYSPECIAL Posts: 744 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Linton said:
    The only benefit to you for going through the £3600 contribution loop would be the tax you save on the tax-free lump sum, ie 20% of £900=£180, so 6.25% return on your initial £2880, ignoring charges.

    Personally I cannot be bothered to do it as £180 over a year is pretty irrelevent to my and most other people's well-being.   Better to avoid the hassle and add the £2880 to your other investments.  Then devote the time to thinking about options with a greater payback in £ terms.


    Paying it into another investment will probably take just as long as paying it into a SIPP. Laptop and debit card ready and it’s done in about a minute.
  • Pat38493
    Pat38493 Posts: 3,339 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    WYSPECIAL said:
    Linton said:
    The only benefit to you for going through the £3600 contribution loop would be the tax you save on the tax-free lump sum, ie 20% of £900=£180, so 6.25% return on your initial £2880, ignoring charges.

    Personally I cannot be bothered to do it as £180 over a year is pretty irrelevent to my and most other people's well-being.   Better to avoid the hassle and add the £2880 to your other investments.  Then devote the time to thinking about options with a greater payback in £ terms.


    Paying it into another investment will probably take just as long as paying it into a SIPP. Laptop and debit card ready and it’s done in about a minute.
    So fundamentally is there any reason that you can't pay in your £2880, and then turn around the next day and take it all out again getting the £180 benefit (as long as you are still within the same marginal tax band)?

    Also do you have to pick the correct provider for this?  I assume providers (or at least some of them) will charge you for the transactions involved?
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,491 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Pat38493 said:
    WYSPECIAL said:
    Linton said:
    The only benefit to you for going through the £3600 contribution loop would be the tax you save on the tax-free lump sum, ie 20% of £900=£180, so 6.25% return on your initial £2880, ignoring charges.

    Personally I cannot be bothered to do it as £180 over a year is pretty irrelevent to my and most other people's well-being.   Better to avoid the hassle and add the £2880 to your other investments.  Then devote the time to thinking about options with a greater payback in £ terms.


    Paying it into another investment will probably take just as long as paying it into a SIPP. Laptop and debit card ready and it’s done in about a minute.
    So fundamentally is there any reason that you can't pay in your £2880, and then turn around the next day and take it all out again getting the £180 benefit (as long as you are still within the same marginal tax band)?

    Also do you have to pick the correct provider for this?  I assume providers (or at least some of them) will charge you for the transactions involved?
    You'll need to wait around 2 months for the SIPP to get the tax relief from HMRC. You may need to jump through a few hoops to withdraw it. Most people just pay in, invest, and withdraw as part of their usual drawdown, you get the same benefit. Although some people seem to see it as a loophole if you take it straight out, it's the same benefit as any normal pension contribution.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.