We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Currys monitor

13»

Comments

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 23,731 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Having worked in a hot desk work environment. Where it is not uncommon for monitors to be running well over 12 hours a day.  Can't ever remember having to have one replaced.
    Current are 21" Philips which are over 4 years old. 
    Life in the slow lane
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    eskbanker said:
    hrawlins said:
    My takeaway is that when using an expensive  PC monitor for over 12 hours a day it is considered reasonable for it to last only 2 years, since it seems to be considered excessive use.

    I won't pursue a claim that it should have lasted longer.
    There isn't consensus on that point - one or two posters may have opined that a couple of years of intensive use is a decent innings, but the opposite view remains valid, i.e. that a high-end quality monitor should be expected to last longer than that.
    It depends what "high end" means... it can mean its just a high quality item in which case longevity should be expected but it can also mean bleeding edge with some ridiculously high resolution/refresh rate using just released display tech in which case longevity may actually be lower than a no bells/whistles workhorse screen.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 40,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    eskbanker said:
    hrawlins said:
    My takeaway is that when using an expensive  PC monitor for over 12 hours a day it is considered reasonable for it to last only 2 years, since it seems to be considered excessive use.

    I won't pursue a claim that it should have lasted longer.
    There isn't consensus on that point - one or two posters may have opined that a couple of years of intensive use is a decent innings, but the opposite view remains valid, i.e. that a high-end quality monitor should be expected to last longer than that.
    It depends what "high end" means... it can mean its just a high quality item in which case longevity should be expected but it can also mean bleeding edge with some ridiculously high resolution/refresh rate using just released display tech in which case longevity may actually be lower than a no bells/whistles workhorse screen.
    True, I was just working on the basis that a monitor costing £749 is clearly not an entry-level cheap and cheerful one, but whether it's high build quality or high spec, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to expect more than two years out of it!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.