We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Do bigger houses go up in value quicker?
Comments
-
On a new build estate, plot position & garden size can also influence price of otherwise identical or similar sized properties.0
-
That's only 97.5m2. The government's absolute minimum recommended size for a 4 bedroom 2 story property is 97m2, but that's for a micro house. In other European countries it is below the minimum legal limit, and well below the typical size.RelievedSheff said:
Much the same as where we currently live.peter3hg said:
New builds vary in size as much as old houses.lookstraightahead said:
This is absolutely true but it's generally quite easy to make extra bedrooms if you have the space. My parents house was built in the 1980s. It's a big corner plot with four beds. But it's twice the size of the new 4-beds down the road from her.silvercar said:
Some people would rather more bedrooms, particularly if they have young children. Better to have each in their own smaller room than share a larger room.YoungBlueEyes said:I check floor plans before I look through the photos. It's alright saying this is a 3 bed semi, but I wanna see if it's decent dimensions. I'd sooner have a large-roomed 2 bed than a squidged in 3bed. And as for a 'double bedroom' that will take a double bed but you'd never fit another stick of furniture in with it...
Mums 4-bed has the same floor space as my 3-bed cottage.
On the site next to me they are selling 4 beds that range from 1060 sq/ft to 2,030 sq/ft with some 5 beds over 3000 sq/ft
Our 3 bed detached is about 1050sq/ft, next doors 4 bed detached is about 1050sq/ft.
You choose which suits you the most.
For us there are only the two of us and the dog with visitors from time to time so the 3 bed made more sense. Next door have a teenage daughter and one of them works from home on a regular basis so the 4 bed made more sense for them even though the bedrooms are smaller.
It's slightly better for a 3 bedroom house, depending on the layout and available storage space, but still very small.
Houses that small should not be built. The legal minimum should be at least 110m2. That's for a detached house, for a semi or terrace it needs to be a bit bigger to allow for reasonable sound isolation between dwellings.0 -
Why? a lot can depend on the layout, and if 97m2 suits the people living there then there is no problem. House size makes no difference to sound isolation for terraced or semis it depends where the sound is generated.
That's only 97.5m2. The government's absolute minimum recommended size for a 4 bedroom 2 story property is 97m2, but that's for a micro house. In other European countries it is below the minimum legal limit, and well below the typical size.
It's slightly better for a 3 bedroom house, depending on the layout and available storage space, but still very small.
Houses that small should not be built. The legal minimum should be at least 110m2. That's for a detached house, for a semi or terrace it needs to be a bit bigger to allow for reasonable sound isolation between dwellings.1 -
You’ve all brought up something I’d not really
thought about before.The house we are selling (a 4 bed detached) is 515sqft upstairs whereas the house we are buying (a 3 bed semi) is 500sqft, so not a whole lot different. However, the difference in layout has resulted in the 4 bed house having an en-suite and a fourth bedroom with that 15sqft extra.1 -
We shouldn't be building houses that small. Houses in the UK last for centuries, barring wars. They need to be built with that in mind.mi-key said:
Why? a lot can depend on the layout, and if 97m2 suits the people living there then there is no problem. House size makes no difference to sound isolation for terraced or semis it depends where the sound is generated.
That's only 97.5m2. The government's absolute minimum recommended size for a 4 bedroom 2 story property is 97m2, but that's for a micro house. In other European countries it is below the minimum legal limit, and well below the typical size.
It's slightly better for a 3 bedroom house, depending on the layout and available storage space, but still very small.
Houses that small should not be built. The legal minimum should be at least 110m2. That's for a detached house, for a semi or terrace it needs to be a bit bigger to allow for reasonable sound isolation between dwellings.
Small houses just lower the minimum space people can afford. If developers were required to build larger homes they would charge the same for them.0 -
It’s no different to the fact that houses are built with barely a garden nowadays. It’s pure greed by the developers, trying to squeeze as many houses onto the plot of land as possible. That’s the main reason I’d never buy a ‘new’ house.[Deleted User] said:
We shouldn't be building houses that small. Houses in the UK last for centuries, barring wars. They need to be built with that in mind.mi-key said:
Why? a lot can depend on the layout, and if 97m2 suits the people living there then there is no problem. House size makes no difference to sound isolation for terraced or semis it depends where the sound is generated.
That's only 97.5m2. The government's absolute minimum recommended size for a 4 bedroom 2 story property is 97m2, but that's for a micro house. In other European countries it is below the minimum legal limit, and well below the typical size.
It's slightly better for a 3 bedroom house, depending on the layout and available storage space, but still very small.
Houses that small should not be built. The legal minimum should be at least 110m2. That's for a detached house, for a semi or terrace it needs to be a bit bigger to allow for reasonable sound isolation between dwellings.
Small houses just lower the minimum space people can afford. If developers were required to build larger homes they would charge the same for them.2 -
I do agree with that point. I would never buy a new build house as you get so much more space and garden for your money. It does make me laugh when you see these estates of 'executive' new builds at huge prices, and they have tiny little gardens and all the houses are crammed in together.
It’s no different to the fact that houses are built with barely a garden nowadays. It’s pure greed by the developers, trying to squeeze as many houses onto the plot of land as possible. That’s the main reason I’d never buy a ‘new’ house.
I had to visit someone on a new build estate recently. These were all 3 and 4 bed detatched, and reasonable size houses ( and by no means a cheap estate ), but they were so crammed in, and the plots so small there was only room for one car on each driveway, so the whole street was full of everyones second cars and the closest I could park was nearly 100 metres away2 -
In many cases it is the councils who push the density because they have housing targets to meet so want the maximum from the small number of sites they have available for development.
Often it would be more profitable for the developers to build a smaller number of bigger houses on bigger plots because the profit margins on those are much better than smaller houses.
I live in a new build and I would describe the garden as an ok size. It is about 45ft long and 50ft wide. While not massive by any means, it is bigger than the gardens in most of the 60s, 70s and 80s era houses I looked at around the same price. 50s and earlier were mostly bigger.
The plot size for the house also is reasonable for a semi compared to others in the price range. There is a 22ft long front garden, tandem drive down the side of the house that would fit four cars at a push and a roughly 20ft by 10ft detached garage that can easily fit a normal sized car.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards