We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

HICBC Commons Debate

I've not seen this posted on here but may well have missed it - I just stumbled across a recent Parliamentary debate on the HICBC if anybody wants the govt. latest thoughts on the matter. I still don't think they really understand the problem  :/ The minister is very clear she insists on paying her own tax and that it shouldn't be combined household, that everybody is taxed on their own earnings and not affected by their partners earnings - I wonder why I am liable for repaying the child benefit my wife claims then  :*

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2023-02-02/debates/0D9BCE1C-7045-4F71-BDD5-E4597555A09D/HighIncomeChildBenefitCharge

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 18 March 2023 at 11:18AM
    You could read it another way though. The child benefit isn’t affected by combined earnings - it could be the case that both earn £49000 - combined earnings of £98000!

    It will be affected if one partner exceeds £50100. 


  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 20,571 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    You could ask your wife to pay the charge  since she received  the benefit.


    Independent taxation means that HMRC cannot divulge one partner's earnings to another.

    Using combined earnings would not be possible without  that happening.

    Some couples do not share that information.

    How would you get round that.

    the reverse situation to yours also applies.

    If your wife was the higher earner and you claimed the child benefit she would be liable for the charge.
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,617 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Benefits based on people living together do not sit well with separate assessment. The real problem though is that benefits can be affected when you just cohabit, as opposed to being married or in a civil partnership. Taxation never takes that into account, so even having an option to be taxed on household income as a married couple, made compulsory if you claim benefits, would not solve the issue.
  • daveaspy
    daveaspy Posts: 102 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    sheramber said:
    You could ask your wife to pay the charge  since she received  the benefit.

    fat chance of that happening  :D

    She doesn't earn over the HICBC threshold though. HMRC does know what I earn and that I'm in the same household though - they would certainly come after me (eventually) if I didn't pay any HICBC due and so they do know what the household is earning, it can't be a massive leap to take both incomes into account.

    TBH I'm not even that bothered about taking both incomes into account, I just think the threshold should have risen way above what it currently is. As it is I've just managed to squeeze under the threshold again and given my pension a boost.
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 20,571 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    I think the threshold to start paying tax should have been increased but the personal allowance has been frozen and continues to be frozen.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.1K Life & Family
  • 252.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.