HL Fund charges am I missing something

in Savings & investments
8 replies 520 views
trevjltrevjl Forumite
192 Posts
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
Forumite
I have had a S&S ISA with HL for about 9 years. It started and still is to some extent a bit of a play thing with both funds and stocks and TBH is a bit all over the place. It has actually done OK and shows a half decent return (more luck than judgement!). As I near retirement I decided about time I had a sort out.
I always knew HL were expensive but wasn't too bothered about it as I liked the website, app and service. However, a recent thread, on here I think, got me looking more closely.
For my sins, I have held a few of their multi manager funds (yes I know!). I have read a few articles regarding the performances and also that they were expensive so I did some digging.
A useful bit on morning star.
 Based on investing £10,000 in this fund over a 5 years period with an expected return of 5%. The investment would be worth £11,102.65 and Total fees would be £1,407.13
If no fees were charged the Investment would be worth £12,762.82, this means your total return after fees is 11.03%

So if my basic 'O' level maths serves me, that is pretty dire. The HL charges are around 1.3% depending on which fund it is + I guess the 0.45% platform fee.
I also noticed that if I went to the individual funds that were shown as the top holdings in the multi manager fund, their individual charges were anything from 0.3% to around 0.7%
Is this as completely !!!!!! as I think it is or am I misreading it ?

Just to point out that this ISA plays no real part in my pension planning as I have enough in both DB & DC pensions.

Replies

  • edited 13 March at 9:02PM
    masonicmasonic Forumite
    20.4K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 13 March at 9:02PM
    You're not wrong about the funds being expensive, but the HL fund charge should include the management charges from the sub-funds, so it's "only" 1.75% + transaction costs. Morningstar's estimate of the impact of this on returns shows how important it is to control costs, because you pay fees on all of your capital, not just the growth. An expensive fund will tend to need to take more risk just to match the return of a cheaper fund, and so while high charges diminish returns in a growth period, they will magnify losses during a downturn.
    There are cheaper options that wouldn't require you to move your ISA, just pick different funds. For example, HL caps management charges on ETFs and investment trusts. They are competitive for large portfolios if you avoid traditional open-ended funds.
  • trevjltrevjl Forumite
    192 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    the HL fund charge should include the management charges from the sub-funds, so it's "only" 1.75% + transaction costs
    You ignore the charges of the underlying assets as you do not pay those.   the fund OCF and TC (dont forget TC) is what you pay and the underlying funds come out of that.

    Thanks, yes I understand that, but in effect surely you are paying it even if not directly. HL are paying it and charging you the difference for their cut ?


  • masonicmasonic Forumite
    20.4K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    trevjl said:
    the HL fund charge should include the management charges from the sub-funds, so it's "only" 1.75% + transaction costs
    You ignore the charges of the underlying assets as you do not pay those.   the fund OCF and TC (dont forget TC) is what you pay and the underlying funds come out of that.

    Thanks, yes I understand that, but in effect surely you are paying it even if not directly. HL are paying it and charging you the difference for their cut ?


    It's already included in the fund management fee of the HL fund. You are paying the sub-funds roughly 0.5% and the HL fund roughly 0.8%.
  • dunstonhdunstonh Forumite
    112.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    trevjl said:
    the HL fund charge should include the management charges from the sub-funds, so it's "only" 1.75% + transaction costs
    You ignore the charges of the underlying assets as you do not pay those.   the fund OCF and TC (dont forget TC) is what you pay and the underlying funds come out of that.

    Thanks, yes I understand that, but in effect surely you are paying it even if not directly. HL are paying it and charging you the difference for their cut ?


    That is why you look a the OCF and the TC together.    The cost of the underlying OCF/TC/IC may be discounted with fund of funds but it has to be reflected in the Fund of Funds charge.    
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • DireEmblemDireEmblem Forumite
    929 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Please double check this, but I believe HL platform fees are about to drop to 0.25% in the next tax year.

    it makes them far more competitive with others, but once your balance grows to a sizeable amount - you may be better with a fixed fee provider such as Interactive Investor.
  • trevjltrevjl Forumite
    192 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    As far as I have seen it's just LISA fees that are dropping and JISA fees doing away with altogether. I was going to move the grandkids JISA's elsewhere until I saw that.
    I am not too bothered with the 0.45%, its more the charges on their funds I was questioning.
  • edited 15 March at 11:10AM
    AlexlandAlexland Forumite
    9.5K Posts
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 15 March at 11:10AM
    trevjl said:
    I am not too bothered with the 0.45%, its more the charges on their funds I was questioning.
    I'd be bothered by all the charges. Paying HL a premium of circa 0.3% pa on the platform fee (basically 3x a good price of 0.15%) over the long term will mean they are getting around 10% more of an investment over a 30 year period and an even higher percentage of the investment return. You the investor are taking the most risk but are giving a lot of your return away which may have been less obvious during rising markets. High fee deductions can be particularly damaging when markets are low. Your contributions should be working for you not HL. Some of us are even paying a lot less than 0.15% on our platform fees.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools