We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Should I be worried? Sibling getting overly comfortable in family house....
Comments
-
The wills state the freehold property will be shared equally, not assets.macman said:Dies the will leave the property to you jointly, or simply leave the assets of the estate jointly to you in equal halves? Two very different things. If the latter, as I hope it is, then as an executor she has a duty to discharge the will to the best benefit of the beneficiaries, which means selling it at a commercial price. She can of course purchase it from the estate, but it can't be sold at a discount without the agreement of the other beneficiaries.
If, as executor, she refused to vacate, then the property would remain unsold, as no conveyancer is going to permit their buyer to exchange without vacant possession. And she would then be liable for the maladministration of her executorship.0 -
This is an extremely important point and I’m not sure why no one has picked up on it yet. If both your parents are in care why is the property being disregarded and the council funding the placement?The_Walker said:
We jointly have power of attorney should that be needed. Their care is currently funded partly by the council and partly by their pensions and savings etc.RAS said:Does anyone have power of attorney with regard to health, and finances, now your parents are in care?
How is their care currently being funded?
Both parents should potentially have been full cost from the moment the second parent entered care. Unless there’s a good reason for this it’s probably an oversight and you’ll likely receive a large bill in the future.On the plus side it does solve this problem for you. You will no longer have to have this conversation with your sister, the council will evict her. However depending on how long the placement lasts it does create another massive issue as your sister could end up homeless with no funds to buy another property.
Ignore the 60+ element a few others have raised. It’ll be from the start of care so that moment has already passed.4 -
Gavin83 said:
This is an extremely important point and I’m not sure why no one has picked up on it yet. If both your parents are in care why is the property being disregarded and the council funding the placement?The_Walker said:
We jointly have power of attorney should that be needed. Their care is currently funded partly by the council and partly by their pensions and savings etc.RAS said:Does anyone have power of attorney with regard to health, and finances, now your parents are in care?
How is their care currently being funded?
Both parents should potentially have been full cost from the moment the second parent entered care. Unless there’s a good reason for this it’s probably an oversight and you’ll likely receive a large bill in the future.On the plus side it does solve this problem for you. You will no longer have to have this conversation with your sister, the council will evict her. However depending on how long the placement lasts it does create another massive issue as your sister could end up homeless with no funds to buy another property.
Ignore the 60+ element a few others have raised. It’ll be from the start of care so that moment has already passed.Health funding?Councils don’t evict people, not do they sell the house from under people as they have no legal authority to do so.
What would happen is that both power of attorneys are expected to act in the best interest of their parents, and if that means selling the house to fund their care, that is what they have to do. The alternative is for the local authority (or someone else) to go to the OPG and have the person removed as power-of-attorney if it can be evidenced that they are not acting in their parent’s best interests.Once the parents have lost capacity, which may or may not be the case at present.
The only way in which any of this affects any will is if by the end of it all any assets have been used for care and there is very little to leave as an inheritance.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
If she doesn't find house renovation pleasurable and does not have the funds, was that just to make a point?The_Walker said:
When she stated her plans to renovate and sell, it rang alarm bells immediately. I couldn't believe what I'd just heard tbh.
Her intentions sound selfish, she wants a secure future. It doesn't sound like she is thinking about how to give you 50%
Is she paying board/money to live there? Does she work or have a good pension for when she gets to retirement?1 -
If it was health funded then the council wouldn’t be contributing to it nor would the residents themselves.elsien said:Gavin83 said:
This is an extremely important point and I’m not sure why no one has picked up on it yet. If both your parents are in care why is the property being disregarded and the council funding the placement?The_Walker said:
We jointly have power of attorney should that be needed. Their care is currently funded partly by the council and partly by their pensions and savings etc.RAS said:Does anyone have power of attorney with regard to health, and finances, now your parents are in care?
How is their care currently being funded?
Both parents should potentially have been full cost from the moment the second parent entered care. Unless there’s a good reason for this it’s probably an oversight and you’ll likely receive a large bill in the future.On the plus side it does solve this problem for you. You will no longer have to have this conversation with your sister, the council will evict her. However depending on how long the placement lasts it does create another massive issue as your sister could end up homeless with no funds to buy another property.
Ignore the 60+ element a few others have raised. It’ll be from the start of care so that moment has already passed.Health funding?Councils don’t evict people, not do they sell the house from under people as they have no legal authority to do so.
What would happen is that both power of attorneys are expected to act in the best interest of their parents, and if that means selling the house to fund their care, that is what they have to do. The alternative is for the local authority (or someone else) to go to the OPG and have the person removed as power-of-attorney if it can be evidenced that they are not acting in their parent’s best interests.Once the parents have lost capacity, which may or may not be the case at present.
The only way in which any of this affects any will is if by the end of it all any assets have been used for care and there is very little to leave as an inheritance.
Councils won’t directly evict people, no. However they won’t just ignore the debt either and they will enforce it, which could lead to the house being sold. Depends on the level of debt. Councils can be ruthless in debt recovery and I’ve seen people put in very difficult positions because of this.
It’s all theory until the length of stay is known. However I stand by what I said, questioning the funding of this is a valid point. It’s not uncommon for councils to not be informed of a change of circumstances.
1 -
If both daughter and son have joint power of attorney, the OP may have no idea what his sister is telling the council. Not everyone is honest.Gavin83 said:
If it was health funded then the council wouldn’t be contributing to it nor would the residents themselves.elsien said:Gavin83 said:
This is an extremely important point and I’m not sure why no one has picked up on it yet. If both your parents are in care why is the property being disregarded and the council funding the placement?The_Walker said:
We jointly have power of attorney should that be needed. Their care is currently funded partly by the council and partly by their pensions and savings etc.RAS said:Does anyone have power of attorney with regard to health, and finances, now your parents are in care?
How is their care currently being funded?
Both parents should potentially have been full cost from the moment the second parent entered care. Unless there’s a good reason for this it’s probably an oversight and you’ll likely receive a large bill in the future.On the plus side it does solve this problem for you. You will no longer have to have this conversation with your sister, the council will evict her. However depending on how long the placement lasts it does create another massive issue as your sister could end up homeless with no funds to buy another property.
Ignore the 60+ element a few others have raised. It’ll be from the start of care so that moment has already passed.Health funding?Councils don’t evict people, not do they sell the house from under people as they have no legal authority to do so.
What would happen is that both power of attorneys are expected to act in the best interest of their parents, and if that means selling the house to fund their care, that is what they have to do. The alternative is for the local authority (or someone else) to go to the OPG and have the person removed as power-of-attorney if it can be evidenced that they are not acting in their parent’s best interests.Once the parents have lost capacity, which may or may not be the case at present.
The only way in which any of this affects any will is if by the end of it all any assets have been used for care and there is very little to leave as an inheritance.
Councils won’t directly evict people, no. However they won’t just ignore the debt either and they will enforce it, which could lead to the house being sold. Depends on the level of debt. Councils can be ruthless in debt recovery and I’ve seen people put in very difficult positions because of this.
It’s all theory until the length of stay is known. However I stand by what I said, questioning the funding of this is a valid point. It’s not uncommon for councils to not be informed of a change of circumstances.1 -
Be ready if she mentions it again. Agree that her suggestion is an option but you will both need to discuss it properly when the time comes.The_Walker said:When she stated her plans to renovate and sell, it rang alarm bells immediately. I couldn't believe what I'd just heard tbh.
1 -
If she mentions renovation next time, just pick up the conversation and ask how she thinks about costs, benefits, selling the house (once parents have passed) and how she thinks about splitting potential proceeds with you, etc
guess only speaking about it with her will help you understand her intentions and expectations, everything else is pure speculation, we all dont know your family’s dynamics …1 -
It will be easier to sell it and each person gets their 50/50
There will be problems if she claims she renovated, spent this etc.
Get your parents or solicitors involved when necessary.0 -
If the will stipulates 50/50 then that is what it is.london21 said:It will be easier to sell it and each person gets their 50/50
There will be problems if she claims she renovated, spent this etc.
Get your parents or solicitors involved when necessary.
could your sister get a mortgage to buy your share. It would be a smaller sum to raise if the property hasn’t been improved.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


