Child Benefit tax

14 Posts

in Cutting tax
I now earn over £50k made up of salary, car allowance and annual bonuses. My wife receives child benefit payments as we have 2 children. It works out at around £145 a month.
I had a letter to say that now I earn over 50k I need to do a self assessment and will be taxed on child benefit payments. Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.
So I'm trying to work out if it's actually worth having them. Seems very harsh that because I earn a bit over 50k that we will now be at least £125 worse off each month.
Is this right? Am I best yo take the hit and just stop getting the payments?
Any help appreciated
I had a letter to say that now I earn over 50k I need to do a self assessment and will be taxed on child benefit payments. Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.
So I'm trying to work out if it's actually worth having them. Seems very harsh that because I earn a bit over 50k that we will now be at least £125 worse off each month.
Is this right? Am I best yo take the hit and just stop getting the payments?
Any help appreciated
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.
Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
I realise it is what it is, but it seems a big tax for someone just going over a threshold.
(Ha sido divertido)
.
That was pointed out as soon as Osborne introduced it but no one has chosen to reverse the change,
So now instead of having it we have to pay it back so we lose the money essentially. Plus now I have to have my tax free allowance reduced to pay back this last year's money.
I realise I'm stuck with no options but it does seem unfair that it's not based on combined household salary