Child Benefit tax
I had a letter to say that now I earn over 50k I need to do a self assessment and will be taxed on child benefit payments. Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.
So I'm trying to work out if it's actually worth having them. Seems very harsh that because I earn a bit over 50k that we will now be at least £125 worse off each month.
Is this right? Am I best yo take the hit and just stop getting the payments?
Any help appreciated
Comments
-
I think it is up to you really -I was on Self assessment anyway , DH got the child benefit, we stuck in it an account to offset the mortgage and then paid it back along with the rest of the tax about 18 months later0
-
It's not actually what you earn that matters.It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
0 -
Dazed_and_C0nfused said:It's not actually what you earn that matters.It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
1 -
Flugelhorn said:I think it is up to you really -I was on Self assessment anyway , DH got the child benefit, we stuck in it an account to offset the mortgage and then paid it back along with the rest of the tax about 18 months later0
-
It was introduced in 2013, and there have been quite a few high profile cases about it.0
-
Sprout0808 said:Dazed_and_C0nfused said:It's not actually what you earn that matters.It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
#2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £3660 -
JGB1955 said:Sprout0808 said:Dazed_and_C0nfused said:It's not actually what you earn that matters.It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
I realise it is what it is, but it seems a big tax for someone just going over a threshold.0 -
Sprout0808 said:JGB1955 said:Sprout0808 said:Dazed_and_C0nfused said:It's not actually what you earn that matters.It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.
And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments.Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.
I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.
I realise it is what it is, but it seems a big tax for someone just going over a threshold.0 -
JGB1955 said:Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension. If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.Sprout0808 said:. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it
.purdyoaten2 said:It’s always been unfair but it’s seems it’s here to stay. Husband and wife both earning 49000 retain full child benefit. One with NSI just over 50000 and the other earning nothing - full child benefit not receivable.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0 -
calcotti said:JGB1955 said:Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension. If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.Sprout0808 said:. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it
So now instead of having it we have to pay it back so we lose the money essentially. Plus now I have to have my tax free allowance reduced to pay back this last year's money.
I realise I'm stuck with no options but it does seem unfair that it's not based on combined household salary0
Categories
- All Categories
- 345.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 450.9K Spending & Discounts
- 237.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 612.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 174.3K Life & Family
- 250.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards