We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues when trying to view threads. Our tech team is working to resolve the problem as quickly as possible. Thank you for your patience.

Child Benefit tax

I now earn over £50k made up of salary, car allowance and annual bonuses. My wife receives child benefit payments as we have 2 children. It works out at around £145 a month. 
I had a letter to say that now I earn over 50k I need to do a self assessment and will be taxed on child benefit payments. Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

So I'm trying to work out if it's actually worth having them. Seems very harsh that because I earn a bit over 50k that we will now be at least £125 worse off each month. 

Is this right? Am I best yo take the hit and just stop getting the payments?

Any help appreciated 
«1

Comments

  • Flugelhorn
    Flugelhorn Posts: 6,089 Forumite
    Photogenic Part of the Furniture Name Dropper 10 Posts
    I think it is up to you really   -I was on Self assessment anyway , DH got the child benefit, we stuck in it an account to offset the mortgage and then paid it back along with the rest of the tax about 18 months later
  • It's not actually what you earn that matters.

    It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.

    And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.

    Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

    Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.

    I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.


  • It's not actually what you earn that matters.

    It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.

    And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.

    Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

    Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.

    I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.


    Yes sorry, that's what i mean by reducing allowances. I have to pay back money from 22-23 and it's reduced for 23-24. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
  • I think it is up to you really   -I was on Self assessment anyway , DH got the child benefit, we stuck in it an account to offset the mortgage and then paid it back along with the rest of the tax about 18 months later
    The problem is we budgeted for having it. I wasn't aware of the tax until I got a letter a couple of months ago
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,517 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It was introduced in 2013, and there have been quite a few high profile cases about it.
  • JGB1955
    JGB1955 Posts: 3,638 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 12 February 2023 at 6:09PM
    It's not actually what you earn that matters.

    It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.

    And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.

    Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

    Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.

    I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.


    Yes sorry, that's what i mean by reducing allowances. I have to pay back money from 22-23 and it's reduced for 23-24. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
    Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension.  If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.
    #2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £366
  • JGB1955 said:
    It's not actually what you earn that matters.

    It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.

    And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.

    Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

    Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.

    I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.


    Yes sorry, that's what i mean by reducing allowances. I have to pay back money from 22-23 and it's reduced for 23-24. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
    Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension.  If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.
    Yes she works part time. I didn't realise about NI benefits. I may have to speak again to HMRC and Child benefit office to get the exact figures and make a decision that way. 
    I realise it is what it is, but it seems a big tax for someone just going over a threshold. 
  • JGB1955 said:
    It's not actually what you earn that matters.

    It's your adjusted net income, which for most people is total taxable income less any Gift Aid payments or some, but not all, pension contributions.

    And it's on a sliding scale so someone with adjusted net income of say £53,000 would ultimately still keep 70% of the Child Benefit.

    Whist this is frustrating I understand but when I got my new tax code it seems , from a discussion with hmrc, that they reduce my personal allowance as I have to pay back most of the benefit payments. 

    Someone has misunderstood something there as the only thing that can reduce your Personal Allowance is having adjusted net income over £100k.

    I suspect you mean your tax code allowances have been reduced, either to pay back HICBC from a previous tax year or to provisionally collect extra tax towards any HICBC due for the tax year the tax code relates to.


    Yes sorry, that's what i mean by reducing allowances. I have to pay back money from 22-23 and it's reduced for 23-24. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
    Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension.  If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.
    Yes she works part time. I didn't realise about NI benefits. I may have to speak again to HMRC and Child benefit office to get the exact figures and make a decision that way. 
    I realise it is what it is, but it seems a big tax for someone just going over a threshold. 
    It’s always been unfair but it’s seems it’s here to stay. Husband and wife both earning 49000 retain full child benefit. One with NSI just over 50000 and the other earning nothing - full child benefit not receivable. 
  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 12 February 2023 at 8:29PM
    JGB1955 said:
    Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension.  If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.
    As JGB says your wife, can if she wishes, continue to claim CB but decline the payments. Note however that NI credits are only attached to Child Benefit under the age of 12 so relevance depends on the age of your youngest child.
    Sprout0808 said:. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
    I can’t see how your household can be worse off. If your income is below £60,000 you keep sum of the CB. If you go over £60,000 you effectively have to pay the CB back. I don’t think you can be worse off.
    .
    It’s always been unfair but it’s seems it’s here to stay. Husband and wife both earning 49000 retain full child benefit. One with NSI just over 50000 and the other earning nothing - full child benefit not receivable. 
    That was pointed out as soon as Osborne introduced it but no one has chosen to reverse the change,
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • calcotti said:
    JGB1955 said:
    Is your partner working? If not it might be worthwhile them claiming the benefit (but not the money) as they will receive NI credits, all of which go to their State Pension.  If you're both working, and grandparent(s) provide child care, THEY can receive the NI benefit.
    As JGB says your wife, can if she wishes, continue to claim CB but decline the payments. Note however that NI credits are only attached to Child Benefit under the age of 12 so relevance depends on the age of your youngest child.
    Sprout0808 said:. I was told that I'd be about £130 worse off if I keep the child benefit so it seems almost pointless to have it 
    I can’t see how your household can be worse off. If your income is below £60,000 you keep sum of the CB. If you go over £60,000 you effectively have to pay the CB back. I don’t think you can be worse off.

    It's based on 50k rather than 60k but the essence is the same. We have been having the 145. I now earn a little bit more (doesn't work out nearly at £145 better off per month)
    So now instead of having it we have to pay it back so we lose the money essentially.  Plus now I have to have my tax free allowance reduced to pay back this last year's money.

    I realise I'm stuck with no options but it does seem unfair that it's not based on combined household salary
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 345.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 450.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 237.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 612.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 174.3K Life & Family
  • 250.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.