We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Leaving money - deprivation of assets

If a parent had 2 children.

One being in care with means tested benefits. 

If the parent left everything in their will to the non-care child... 

Could this be seen as deprivation of assets


«1

Comments

  • Ciprico said:
    If a parent had 2 children.

    One being in care with means tested benefits. 

    If the parent left everything in their will to the non-care child... 

    Could this be seen as deprivation of assets
    No, it would not be deprivation of assets as the child has no automatic right to inheritance and the money is not theirs. 
  • pmlindyloo
    pmlindyloo Posts: 13,099 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ciprico said:
    If a parent had 2 children.

    One being in care with means tested benefits. 

    If the parent left everything in their will to the non-care child... 

    Could this be seen as deprivation of assets


    The individual in care and claiming means tested benefits could challenge the will specifically on the grounds that they were not adequately provided for - but an expensive business to do so.

    If this is an hypothetical question and the person is not deceased but thinking of making a will, then they should get some advice about setting up a discretionary trust (I believe that is the term) for the individual in care.

    Hopefully someone knowing more about these discretionary trusts will be able to give more information.
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,240 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    Could the organisation responsible for the care of the individual challenge the will on the same basis?
  • TELLIT01 said:
    Could the organisation responsible for the care of the individual challenge the will on the same basis?
    No
    It has to be the person.
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • Caz3121
    Caz3121 Posts: 15,874 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    the child has no automatic right to inheritance and the money is not theirs. 
    in Scotland there are 'legal rights' for children so cannot disinherit although the child can choose to waive their legal rights.
  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 14,625 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    TELLIT01 said:
    Could the organisation responsible for the care of the individual challenge the will on the same basis?
    No
    It has to be the person.

    Surely it would depend on exactly why the person is in care and whether the organsation looking after them has POA for them ? If the person lacks mental capacity and the organisation has POA, then I think you could argue that they'd possibly be acting in their best interests in at least considering putting forward a challenge on their behalf. (Depending of course on the potential cost of lodging a claim as against the potential inheritance).
    If they can't then you are in effect saying that someone lacking the capacity to do so themself is not able to make any challenge to a will., which doesn't seem right.
  • diystarter7
    diystarter7 Posts: 5,202 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hi OP

    Hopefully you are in England where the law sides with the person/s that have worked hard to build up an estate and therefore its up to them to give to oe, both or none of the children as they could blow it away give it away to anyone they wanted to.

    Thanks
  • TELLIT01 said:
    Could the organisation responsible for the care of the individual challenge the will on the same basis?
    No
    It has to be the person.

    Surely it would depend on exactly why the person is in care and whether the organsation looking after them has POA for them ? If the person lacks mental capacity and the organisation has POA, then I think you could argue that they'd possibly be acting in their best interests in at least considering putting forward a challenge on their behalf. (Depending of course on the potential cost of lodging a claim as against the potential inheritance).
    If they can't then you are in effect saying that someone lacking the capacity to do so themself is not able to make any challenge to a will., which doesn't seem right.



    Yes i would depend on the situation but the question was about deprivation of assets.
    AFAIK  a will can't be challenged for this reason as the body (eg DWP) has no right to do so.

    If someone has POA the  the challenge would still be  in the name of the person who would inherit, but would have to be in the person's interest.

    If the persons needs are being met in the care home then I  doubt there could be a challenge,  but if they aren't then that person  or via their POA could challenge it.

     




    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • I have two brothers, love one, hate the other.
    Only one will inherit from me.
    Thats life and no one else’s business.

    Im hoping the brother above that’s inheriting the money would know why and make sure his brother is secure financially.
    why give money to someone knowing it will be taken away. 

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,523 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 4 February 2023 at 9:03AM
    TELLIT01 said:
    Could the organisation responsible for the care of the individual challenge the will on the same basis?
    No
    It has to be the person.

    Surely it would depend on exactly why the person is in care and whether the organsation looking after them has POA for them ? If the person lacks mental capacity and the organisation has POA, then I think you could argue that they'd possibly be acting in their best interests in at least considering putting forward a challenge on their behalf. (Depending of course on the potential cost of lodging a claim as against the potential inheritance).
    If they can't then you are in effect saying that someone lacking the capacity to do so themself is not able to make any challenge to a will., which doesn't seem right.
    Organisations looking after people tend not to have power-of-attorney for them because that would be a conflict of interest. Even if the person was able to make a power-of-attorney.

    And if the person is someone for example with a learning disability who only has benefits, they wouldn’t need a deputyship because the amount of money doesn’t make it worthwhile. They would just having an appointee. 



    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.