We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

DIY or stick with IFA

135

Comments

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,978 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Scallypud said:
    Scallypud said:
    f i was to transfer my pension to my private SIPP would i incur exit fees?
    Probably not, but you need to dig out the paperwork to check. If instead you employed a new cheaper IFA, they would sort that out for you.
    The only problem i have with transferring out is that i'm locking in my losses.
    0.9% down from this time last year which is probably the same as everyone else

    You only really lock in losses, if you sell the investments.

    In any case only losing less than 1% in the last 12 months is a good result.

    I looked yesterday and from Jan1st 2021 to today , I am still 6 to 7% down , which I think is pretty typical/average.
    Sorry for misleading you but my SIPP is down 9% from this time last year
    That looks more normal. If you have not checked it for a while, you might find that figure has improved as markets have been on the up in January.
  • Scallypud
    Scallypud Posts: 118 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts
    6% is far higher than could occur for a normal fund.  I would guess that in this case it is a fund that owns property, probably commercial property - ie the fund is a landlord.  Clearly being a landlord of a physical building incures far higher costs than merely buying and selling investments.  Despite the high overheads renting out property is still a reasonable business
    The shares that cost 6% are as follows

    Supermarket income REIT Plc ord
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    edited 2 February 2023 at 1:11PM
    Scallypud said:
    6% is far higher than could occur for a normal fund.  I would guess that in this case it is a fund that owns property, probably commercial property - ie the fund is a landlord.  Clearly being a landlord of a physical building incures far higher costs than merely buying and selling investments.  Despite the high overheads renting out property is still a reasonable business
    The shares that cost 6% are as follows

    Supermarket income REIT Plc ord

    Yes that explains it.  Sipermarkets sell their buildings to a property company and then rent them back.  Avoids large amounts of wealth being tied up in a way where it cannot be used and reduces maintenance hassle/costs since the supermarket would not naturally have expertise in that area.  It may be useful for an investor as the company's income is stable, pretty safe  and guaranteed for many years.

  • ian16527
    ian16527 Posts: 260 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Scallypud said:
    This might be a stupid question but here goes ,
    Quilter = 0.9% IFA = 0.7% Total 1.6%
    As for the Weighted cost for collective funds fee would i still have this to pay even with a new IFA?
    Al  the so please advise what is a reasonable fee for an IFA?

    0.5% ongoing seems to be the rate
    I checked Quilter out as my friends brother was investing via them.
    The fund was no better than a multi asset fund such as HSBC global balanced but their fees were quite high.

    What is the fund(s) you are invested in? This may give some comparison if yu were to go it alone which is not difficult
  • bostonerimus
    bostonerimus Posts: 5,617 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 February 2023 at 3:19PM
    OP, you sort of burst the bubble and maybe we can now see the naked emperor with your comment about beating your IFA's returns in your DIY account and maybe it was just luck...but a concrete reason that you are beating your IFA is the 2.4% fees they are charging, anyone would struggle with that drag on a portfolio. I would certainly get those fees way down or go DIY if you are comfortable with that.
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
  • Scallypud
    Scallypud Posts: 118 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts
    ian16527 said:
    What is the fund(s) you are invested in? This may give some comparison if yu were to go it alone which is not difficult
    The funds are as follows

    Equities UK = 21.43%
    Equities North America = 17.5%
    Fixed Interest UK = 16.42%
    Alternative Investments = 11.29%
    Equities Global = 6.91%
    Equities Europe Ex UK = 6.72%
    Equities Emerging Markets = 5.56%
    Fixed Interest Overseas = 4.43%
    Equities Japan = 3.29%
    Equities Asia Pacific Ex Japan = 2,17%
    Cash = 4.29%
  • bd10
    bd10 Posts: 347 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Does this asset allocation not look rather similar to say Vanguard's Lifestrategy with 80% equity weighting, UK bias?
    With the obvious exceptin of 11% alternative investments. If the match/correlation is significant enough, I'd be inclined to implement that myself with a tracker fund or Lifestrategy out of the box and add alternatives to it. The total cost structure would be much lower.
  • Scallypud
    Scallypud Posts: 118 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts
    edited 2 February 2023 at 4:41PM
    HL are now offering cashback if you transfer your pension to them 
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    bd10 said:
    Does this asset allocation not look rather similar to say Vanguard's Lifestrategy with 80% equity weighting, UK bias?
    With the obvious exceptin of 11% alternative investments. If the match/correlation is significant enough, I'd be inclined to implement that myself with a tracker fund or Lifestrategy out of the box and add alternatives to it. The total cost structure would be much lower.
    It does not look particularly like VLS80 to me.  VLS80 has more than twice as much US (48%) , and you cant really wave away the alternative investments (property?).  Sure, with a bit of effort you could duplicate this portfolio but I doubt whether it would be a fruitful exercise.  The allocations seem rather old fashioned.  More useful for someone to develop a portfolio with documented justification based on the OPs current and future needs and their risk acceptance rather than just accepting the portfolio without understanding it.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 28,978 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Scallypud said:
    HL are now offering cashback if you transfer your pension to them 
    And it is rather generous, especially for larger pots ( £1500 cashback)
    However HL is more expensive than nearly all other similar platforms.
    An extra platform cost of 0.2% on nearly £400K, would = £800 pa 

    However more important if you decide to DIY, is what to invest in on the platform, whether it is HL or another one.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.