We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Freehold or Leasehold?
Comments
-
But like I said, there doesn't seem to be any advantage in the OP doing this now? If the eventual wish of whoever inherits the property is to sell off the flats individually, they can do that at the time (and create new leases in the process, assuming leasehold even still exists by then...).KiKi said:
If that's the case, OP, then you are the freeholder of the whole building, and the leaseholder of both flats. I would simply speak to a solicitor, and extend the lease to both flats - so as a freeholder you'd be extending the leases to yourself (I assume that's doable - but a solicitor can advise). That way, the flats are sellable, if it comes to it.
1 -
That doesn't seem to be what the OP is saying:KiKi said:I read the situation differently: there are two flats, both of which are leasehold, but the bottom flat owner also owns the freehold to the building.critchley said:When the tenants of the lower flat died we also bought that which was freehold.
But even if you're correct, it makes no difference to the advice. The best solution would be to extend or replace the lease(s) when the time comes to sell the flats. (Unless the OP wants to do something different to protect their grandson.)KiKi said:
If that's the case, OP, then you are the freeholder of the whole building, and the leaseholder of both flats. I would simply speak to a solicitor, and extend the lease to both flats - so as a freeholder you'd be extending the leases to yourself (I assume that's doable - but a solicitor can advise).
Unfortunately, it isn't doable. A lease extension is a deed - you cannot have a deed between yourself and yourself. Similarly, you can't grant a new lease to yourself.
So the OP would have to do something like transfer the freehold into a different name.
That's one reason it's easier to wait until the flat(s) are sold - the OP (or their heirs) can simply grant the lease extension or new lease to whoever is buying the flat.
1 -
Thanks everyone and I appreciate everyone's input. From what I have read here it does seem that we could do nothing and let the beneficiaries sort it out after we're gone or that there doesn't seem to be a "one size fits all" answer and if we want to do anything whilst alive we obviously need serious guidance from a Solicitor.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
