We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Motability
Comments
-
The problem is, that mobility naturally dectrases with age, so that would mean that all older people would qualify.
Getting old isn't a disability, just a natural part of life.
Maybe the answer may be to extend the age at whichPIP can be claimed to 70 or 75.
Yje issue with that though, is that PIP is harder yp hry, and so people that are awarded AA may find they don't qualify for PIP0 -
reply to nannytone-2:
Some may find that they don't get PIP, but lot's in desperate need, like the lady who lost a leg, would gain, as would those whose problem is not necessarily age related, but began after the deadline. (eg. from accident, effects of an operation, infection, suffering violence).
I've never had PIP, but found that some of the things which appear to be ignored for AA are actually taken into account.
The present benefit rules that require a number of months of suffering, before entitlement and the rules which decide the amount of impairment required for entitlement, would be applied so make sure that not every old person qualified.0 -
A single leg amputee would only get the mobility element if their prosthetic caused problems such as pain or sores AND they were unable to repeatedly and reliably crutch more than 50m, for some reason (pain, fatigue, weakness, etc.) - for more than half the time. If an elderly person cannot use crutches then technically it has to be due to a disability and not 'just' being older*.teddysmum said:reply to nannytone-2:
Some may find that they don't get PIP, but lot's in desperate need, like the lady who lost a leg, would gain, as would those whose problem is not necessarily age related, but began after the deadline. (eg. from accident, effects of an operation, infection, suffering violence).
'Standing and moving' for PIP only requires having one biological foot on the floor, not two.
*EDIT: I mean 'has to be' under the current way of thinking, which at least some people agree with. It can't be both ways, either being elderly can be disabling or it's not - but if it's not recognised as potentially a disability then it also wouldn't qualify anyone for mobility help, even if pensioners could claim a mobility benefit.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards