We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Denied warm home discount
Comments
-
No they haven't. BEIS, a goverment department, ran the property calculations. DWP then use benefit claimant information to match up high cost properties with people claiming a qualifying means-tested benefit.Mikebella said:I presume she meets the low income criteria otherwise she wouldn't be pursuing it. OVO energy, I don't think they have specific criteria this time around as DWP has contracted a private company to judge who is eligible for the discount. This seems to be part of the problem as they have come across as incompetent and have no knowledge of what is actually going on.
(Source: Ofgem guidance for suppliers.)
The property calculation is based on age, type and size. At 58m² her property would have to be a detached house, bungalow or flat built before 1919 to qualify.
More info here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/warm-home-discount-eligibility-statement-england-and-wales
And the property calculation here https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1115362/whd-eligibility-statement-2022-england-wales-annex-1.xlsx
Edit: actually if she lives in anything except a flat, the relevant floor area would be 66m², 14% more than the EPC says. This would mean the property could also qualify if it were a detached house built between 1919-1944, or a pre-1919 end terrace or semi-detached.
If she lives in a flat it would still have to be pre-1919.
Also many people have met the income criteria in previous years but this year it has been tightened, so it is possible she assumes she meets the income criteria but doesn't - info on that is in the eligibility statement linked too. But without knowing why she qualified in previous years it's impossible to comment on the likelihood of that.1 -
Where is the 58 m2 figure coming from? If it's from an EPC it could well be incorrect, they're not usually the most accurate things. My EPC states my place is 98 m2 and yet my next door neighbour with a larger property is 86 m2. Worth checking that 58 m2 figure if 66 m2 is what's needed to get WHD.1
-
The different figure I used is because the WHD eligibility statement states a house's EPC floor area will be increased by 14% to match VOA data. (A flat's will be decreased by 23%.)NeilJ66 said:Where is the 58 m2 figure coming from? If it's from an EPC it could well be incorrect, they're not usually the most accurate things. My EPC states my place is 98 m2 and yet my next door neighbour with a larger property is 86 m2. Worth checking that 58 m2 figure if 66 m2 is what's needed to get WHD.
The cutoff for different age and property types can be seen from the calculation table.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards