We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
UC housing cost suppport - no rental contract scenario
Options
Comments
-
HillStreetBlues said:This bit I'm unsure of as more to do with UC., but these are my thoughts.
As the AST carries over, you are still liable for payment, as you have shown UC this I can not see why you would need to inform DWP about the change.
Your liability hasn't changed just who you pay.
Not currently in AST, were in periodic tenancy now.
0 -
seatbeltnoob said:HillStreetBlues said:This bit I'm unsure of as more to do with UC., but these are my thoughts.
As the AST carries over, you are still liable for payment, as you have shown UC this I can not see why you would need to inform DWP about the change.
Your liability hasn't changed just who you pay.
Not currently in AST, were in periodic tenancy now.
Yes but your original tenancy agreement will still be valid. Being in a periodic tenancy doesn't make the tenancy agreement invalid.
0 -
seatbeltnoob said:Not currently in AST, were in periodic tenancy now.
Let's Be Careful Out There0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards