📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Talking about TVs

Options
2

Comments

  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 January 2023 at 1:03PM
    The biggest difference really is in standby and this is the same with all modern TVs, they are rated at 0.5w, but that is with WiFi turned off, with WiFi on and wake on app etc. in the background mine uses 25w and that seems pretty standard,
    Its annoying that after the one watt initiative forced manufacturers to make products consume less on standby they are adding a feature where standby isn't really standby.
    25w continuously for a year costs about £75 in electricity.

  • sevenhills
    sevenhills Posts: 5,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My 43" Toshiba is rated at 75w but it's stated usage is 54w
    I believe it's around five years old, when it fails I will possibly get a larger TV. I don't believe a new TV will use less energy, but I will Google it.
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I've just checked a 15+ year old panasonic tv which I use in my bedroom. Watched through its freeview tuner it uses 85w but when switching to a now tv box connected through HDMI it jumps to 110w. I've switched backwards and forwards between the two and tried different programmes to account for screen brightness. No idea how to account for the different energy consumption. The now tv box uses 2.5-3w and is on regardless of whats being viewed. 
  • sevenhills
    sevenhills Posts: 5,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I disconnected my Freeview recorder and DVD player because they are never used and just consume power. I can reconnect when ever I wish.
  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 11,222 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    My 43" Toshiba is rated at 75w but it's stated usage is 54w
    I believe it's around five years old, when it fails I will possibly get a larger TV. I don't believe a new TV will use less energy, but I will Google it.
    A modern TV, especially an OLED will use a fair amount less when being actively used, although depending on how it is set up it could use more in standby due to the way WiFi and smart features are configured. 
  • Mstty
    Mstty Posts: 4,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    My 43" Toshiba is rated at 75w but it's stated usage is 54w
    I believe it's around five years old, when it fails I will possibly get a larger TV. I don't believe a new TV will use less energy, but I will Google it.
    A modern TV, especially an OLED will use a fair amount less when being actively used, although depending on how it is set up it could use more in standby due to the way WiFi and smart features are configured. 
    A modern TV(huge range there to lump into the statement) will never use less energy being used.

    🤔 I'm scratching my head here even with the overhead of WiFi......will have a beer and think on that one.

  • MattMattMattUK
    MattMattMattUK Posts: 11,222 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Mstty said:
    My 43" Toshiba is rated at 75w but it's stated usage is 54w
    I believe it's around five years old, when it fails I will possibly get a larger TV. I don't believe a new TV will use less energy, but I will Google it.
    A modern TV, especially an OLED will use a fair amount less when being actively used, although depending on how it is set up it could use more in standby due to the way WiFi and smart features are configured. 
    A modern TV(huge range there to lump into the statement) will never use less energy being used.
    Older TVs generally use more energy when in active use, less efficient technology, LEDs and various backlights have got more efficient and OLED is more efficient again.
    Mstty said:
    🤔 I'm scratching my head here even with the overhead of WiFi......will have a beer and think on that one.
    Non-smart TVs use less power in standby due to the overheads of the smart tech, more so when WiFi stays active when in standby, network wake and app wake are running etc. In default configuration, they can be set to use as low as 0.3w in standby.
  • Qyburn
    Qyburn Posts: 3,619 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The biggest difference really is in standby and this is the same with all modern TVs, they are rated at 0.5w, but that is with WiFi turned off, with WiFi on and wake on app etc. in the background mine uses 25w and that seems pretty standard,
    Its annoying that after the one watt initiative forced manufacturers to make products consume less on standby they are adding a feature where standby isn't really standby.
    25w continuously for a year costs about £75 in electricity.

    That 25W isn't normal. Our Sony uses 2W in what they call "network standby". I suspect there's something else going on.  Did you take a quick measure, or leave it for a while? Ours draws 11 or 12W when first put into standby, or if the power is restored, then after a two or three minutes it drops to the 0.5W (or 2W if networked)

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,707 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Qyburn said:
    The biggest difference really is in standby and this is the same with all modern TVs, they are rated at 0.5w, but that is with WiFi turned off, with WiFi on and wake on app etc. in the background mine uses 25w and that seems pretty standard,
    Its annoying that after the one watt initiative forced manufacturers to make products consume less on standby they are adding a feature where standby isn't really standby.
    25w continuously for a year costs about £75 in electricity.

    That 25W isn't normal. Our Sony uses 2W in what they call "network standby". I suspect there's something else going on.  Did you take a quick measure, or leave it for a while? Ours draws 11 or 12W when first put into standby, or if the power is restored, then after a two or three minutes it drops to the 0.5W (or 2W if networked)


    Our LG OLEDs used 27W in standby with the mobile connectivity options on.   Wit it turned off, it uses an amount so small that the Tapo cannot register it.

    We have three LG OLEDs.  2016,2019 and 2022 models.   The latest models use less energy than the earliest one.      Although the latest one is in the winter lounge where the room is darker and the brightness/contrast levels are lower.   The oldest one is in the kitchen under the brightest lights and runs with higher contrast/brightness.    So, that is more likely to the reason for difference.


    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Mstty
    Mstty Posts: 4,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 8 January 2023 at 7:28PM
    Mstty said:
    My 43" Toshiba is rated at 75w but it's stated usage is 54w
    I believe it's around five years old, when it fails I will possibly get a larger TV. I don't believe a new TV will use less energy, but I will Google it.
    A modern TV, especially an OLED will use a fair amount less when being actively used, although depending on how it is set up it could use more in standby due to the way WiFi and smart features are configured. 
    A modern TV(huge range there to lump into the statement) will never use less energy being used.
    Older TVs generally use more energy when in active use, less efficient technology, LEDs and various backlights have got more efficient and OLED is more efficient again.
    Mstty said:
    🤔 I'm scratching my head here even with the overhead of WiFi......will have a beer and think on that one.
    Non-smart TVs use less power in standby due to the overheads of the smart tech, more so when WiFi stays active when in standby, network wake and app wake are running etc. In default configuration, they can be set to use as low as 0.3w in standby.
    The person you wer replying to was talking about a 5 year old TV I would presume smart and WiFi connected to be honest.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.