We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Cash from Family towards a deposit.

House purchase £400k
Couple buying it have a £100k Deposit
They are going for a £240k mortgage
A family member wants to help with £60k

Family member doesn't want the money back and it will pass upon death, but just want it protected if something happens etc. 
They are thinking of a 2nd charge on the property for the value, or more likely the percentage. 

Is this the most sensible approach?? 
What are the implications of the charge?
Will the 60k still form part of the family members estate, will that charge on the said property need to be stated and left to the home owners? 
The main aim is that if the home owners relationship fails and the house is sold as a failed venture, they would want their money protected after debts, and mortgage have been paid assuming there's still value in the house sale. 

Any better way of dealing with this situation? 
Thanks in advance. 
«1345

Comments

  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,895 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Mortgage lenders are generally only happy with gifts, rather than loans. So they may not entertain the idea of a second charge on the property. Also a loan would form part of an estate and may incur IHT liability.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 19,579 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 December 2022 at 1:34PM
    When you say "their money", whose do you mean? The partner whose "side" contributed the money should get it back if the relationship breaks up. If the gifter doesn't want it back then it doesn't make sense for them to get a charge registered in their name, and as said the lender is unlikely to agree to that anyway - they expect any gifts to have no strings attached.
  • 6022tivo
    6022tivo Posts: 819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    silvercar said:
    Mortgage lenders are generally only happy with gifts, rather than loans. So they may not entertain the idea of a second charge on the property. Also a loan would form part of an estate and may incur IHT liability.
    Ok thanks. 
    Will have to look at the wording and terminology then I guess. 
    It won't be expected to be paid back at any point, and as far as the mortgage goes it will just form part of the deposit. 

    As far as I recall back in the day when I've done this before (20 years ago), when the solicitor sends the paperwork to the land registry, as long as the Mortgage lender is the 1st in the list, a second charge can be added with no concerns of the 1st? 

    Does this still sound about right?
  • diystarter7
    diystarter7 Posts: 5,202 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hi OP

    From what I know, it's either a gift or not.
    Lenders as stated by Silvercar are not happy with setups like that.  Just ask yourself, someone gives you 60k/etc, its not a gift, but it is a gift. The person lending/gifting the money may want it back the next day, next week, month, etc.  What would happen if the person wanted their money back three months into the mortgage, I think you know the answer and lenders rightly so are not fans of stuff like this.

    Thanks
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 22,835 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The thing about gifts is that they are absolute and once given you loose control. 

    The couple could take ownership of the purchase as tenants in common with a deed of trust with an uneven split in ownership. 
  • youth_leader
    youth_leader Posts: 3,034 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I've given my son and daughter a money gift towards a house deposit, and have sent them a Declaration letter I found on line.  When they are ready to apply for a mortgage I'll be getting my solicitor to do a Deed of Trust for both.  
    £216 saved 24 October 2014
  • 6022tivo
    6022tivo Posts: 819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Thanks for that @youth_leader
    I'll have a google. 


    The reason for the initial question was around 20 years ago I was involved in a house purchase and the partners family chucked some money towards it, and the solicitor simply added a 2nd charge (After the mortgage company had been financially satisfied) of that said amount to the person who chucked the money in. 

    They got it back when the house was ever sold if that makes sense. 
    It was a very simple process that if I remember rightly didn't even go via the mortgage company as it wasn't a charge that would affect them in any way.youth_leader said:
    I've given my son and daughter a money gift towards a house deposit, and have sent them a Declaration letter I found on line.  When they are ready to apply for a mortgage I'll be getting my solicitor to do a Deed of Trust for both.  

  • 6022tivo
    6022tivo Posts: 819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I've given my son and daughter a money gift towards a house deposit, and have sent them a Declaration letter I found on line.  When they are ready to apply for a mortgage I'll be getting my solicitor to do a Deed of Trust for both.  
    After a quick google. 

    Looks like they should buy/register the property as "Tenants in common" and then a solicitor would draw up a "deed of trust"

    So for the above, would this change anything about the mortgage offer at all? Or how the house is registered with the mortgage company. 
  • youth_leader
    youth_leader Posts: 3,034 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As far as I understand it many mortgage lenders do like it to be an uncomplicated no strings 'gift'.  Once my kids go to a mortgage broker, for money laundering regulations I think their solicitor will ask me to prove my gift with ID etc and a paper trail, which I've already got ready after much effort, wish I hadn't gone paper free for statements.  
    £216 saved 24 October 2014
  • Gavin83
    Gavin83 Posts: 8,757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As a few others have said, it's either a gift or it's not. You can't pick and choose the benefits of both. If it's truly a gift then there should be no charge on the property as that would suggest it was a loan, a gift meaning the money then belongs to the other party with no strings attached. If it is a loan then it shouldn't be declared as a gift to the mortgage company as that would essentially be fraud.

    They need to decide whether it's a gift or a loan and act accordingly. This is also assuming there's no possibility of the person gifting the money requiring care anytime soon otherwise deprivation of assets would come into play too.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.