We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Solar panels going to be overshadowed by neighbour's loft extension
Comments
- 
            Hi OP
 Personally, I'd not have solar P's even if I was paid thousands as they look hideous to me.
 However, your heads-up will be appreciated by many and me included as many people ask me about everything and I'll remember this one.
 Many thanks 0 0
- 
            Every time my FIT payments come in i think what a terrible decision i made having the panels installed.
 When my iboost tells me i have another tank of free hot water and i only had to import 3kwh from the grid i curse those ugly panels.
 It will be even worse next year as they impose a 10 - 15% increase in the amount of money i will receive.6
- 
            
 I know, it's dreadful - isn't itKrakkkers said:Every time my FIT payments come in i think what a terrible decision i made having the panels installed.
 When my iboost tells me i have another tank of free hot water and i only had to import 3kwh from the grid i curse those ugly panels.
 It will be even worse next year as they impose a 10 - 15% increase in the amount of money i will receive. 3 3
- 
            I look at my energy account and see it's £340 in credit and wonder how this can be possible when I've not paid them a penny since it was opened in April.
 Then I remember the hideously ugly panels I had installed on the roof in March.Barnsley, South Yorkshire
 Solar PV 5.25kWp SW facing (14 x 375) installed Mar 22
 Lux 3.6kw hybrid inverter and 9.6kw Pylontech batteries
 Daikin 8kW ASHP installed Jan 25
 Octopus Cosy/Fixed Outgoing3
- 
            That's a mad situation OP, thanks for the heads-up.
 How are you approaching fighting it? Which legislation or CoP are you going by?0
- 
            
- 
            There was the old "right to light" in early planning legislation, but obviously solar panels weren't around back then (Victorian?)0
- 
            
 so if I don't want my neighbours to build an extension I should lob some panels on my roof??Krakkkers said:
 I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe, Old Style Money Saving and Pensions boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
 Click on this link for a Statement of Accounts that can be posted on the DebtFree Wannabe board: https://lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php
 Check your state pension on: Check your State Pension forecast - GOV.UK
 "Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.” Nellie McClung
 ⭐️🏅😇🏅🏅🏅0
- 
            The law isnt that stupid, panels have to exist first.0
- 
            Now I will really bore you all with my saga. The Medway case Brie mentions means that solar panels now have to be viewed as a material consideration in planning applications. Problem is what is a material consideration. My Council's report was done by the BRE who very quietly published guidance on overshadowing earlier this year as a section in its Right to Light guidance and suggested a 10% level (no explanation/ justification of this given). The solar section is flawed because it referred MCS guidance published in 2012 which has been updated several times since. Even using the flawed section, report for my panels says loss will exceed 10%!! But I have another argument - Council never mentioned overshadowing when promoting Solar Together so must have adopted an unpublished policy not to allow future overshadowing. Council planners rejected that because it was not in local development plan. Now put forward argument that when promoting the latest Solar Together round, overshadowing risk was still not mentioned so presumably, while it amended the local plan, it set a materiality level such that no future overshadowing would be allowed!! No doubt Council lawyers are looking as to how it can wriggle out of that!!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
                 
          
         

