We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

De-investing, when to call it quits?

2»

Comments

  • Sea_Shell said:
    General hypothetical question alert.


    We know that the "rule" of investing is to only invest for the longer term, which is usually for a minimum of at least 3-5 yrs.

    What about on the way back out?    Does the same rule usually apply?

    e.g. you have (had) an investment pot from which you NEEDED, say, £12k pa.    As it gets whittled away (as it's been drawn at an unsustainable rate), at what point do you "cash out" as a rule of thumb?

    Once you have only 3-5 yrs cash equivalent worth left? (£36-£60k), or would you just keep going until the bitter end and a zero balance, once you're resigned to the fact that you know it will inevitably run out.   Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon!

    Would there come a point where an FA would make contact and tell you that you really should cash-out now, or stop making withdrawals?   Or would this be customer lead?


    (Please take this at face value, ignore other income, spending, other assets etc, as this is just an example.)
    On reflection, I think this hypothetical has too little information to be answered. If there's a NEED for £12k pa from this investment pot, then we have to know what happens after it's used up, whether having been invested as long as possible, all withdrawn into secure savings and used up that way, or something in between. Is the NEED to see someone through until a state pension will become available at a known time, for instance? Or is it something like "they will they have to leave their house, being unable to afford the rent, and move in with relatives", for which you might say "do whatever you can to stave it off as long as possible"?

    I don't think we can "ignore other income, spending, other assets etc". We need to know if the downside of it only lasting 4 years is a lot bigger than the upside of it lasting 6 years.
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,799 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    @EthicsGradient
    My thoughts too.
    The answer to ‘what happens when the money runs out’? will surely affect the answer to Sea_Shell’s hypothetical question. 

    @dunstonh
    Thanks for sharing the advice you gave your 78 year old client. I’m a little younger but needed to hear that again. I’m sure I’m not alone😊
  • Swipe
    Swipe Posts: 6,149 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    badger09 said:
    Thanks for sharing the advice you gave your 78 year old client. I’m a little younger but needed to hear that again. I’m sure I’m not alone😊
    I'm in a similar boat, you are not alone
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Basically, when its gone, it's gone and the "beneficiary" will have to manage without.

    In the current climate, that could mean great hardship. ☹️

    I think I'll leave it there, as "it's complicated" and I was just trying to guesstimate what sort of balance would trigger de-investing in the scenario described.

    Thanks all.



    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)
  • Sea_Shell said:
    Basically, when its gone, it's gone and the "beneficiary" will have to manage without.

    In the current climate, that could mean great hardship. ☹️

    I think I'll leave it there, as "it's complicated" and I was just trying to guesstimate what sort of balance would trigger de-investing in the scenario described.

    Thanks all.



    So is the £12k/year figure really that fixed? They may take that much now, but the sudden transition from 12k to 0 seems extreme. Wouldn't the possibility of using a bit less each year, with the hope of staving off great hardship longer, be worth thinking about?

    But if there isn't a fixed date it needs to last until, I'd say "keep it invested", as I did in my first post (if it can be somewhere without high fixed charges). It's likely to grow more in the stock market than a savings account.
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,283 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    £12k was an example figure.  It was about multiples, in general terms.



    Sorry, I don't want this thread to get "personal" and get in to all the whys and wherefores.

    I've (sort of) got my answer, so thanks all.
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.