We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Seperation, marital home sold, equity, kids and UC

2»

Comments

  • Pretty sure children's savings are counted when it comes to benefits.



    If the savings are in the childrens names no they are not. However, the mother "giving away" her money to her children and then continuing to claim means tested benefits is as advised, deprivation of capital.

    Only if the money is in a Junior ISA or under £3000.  If they put it in a Junior ISA I am pretty sure that defeats the object of what they are trying to achieve, eg, stuffing enough money away in the kid's names to bring below the savings threshold to claim UC.  They may genuinely want to put £40k of just the mother's half of the equity away for the kids when they are 18 but I am not getting that feeling here.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.