We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Boiler cover /policy

2

Comments

  • This is what was in the paperwork 
  • Anita277 said:
    This is what was in the paperwork 
    That seems contradictory.  On the one hand it says the appliance requires isolation and you said that he's also put stickers on the boiler saying "Do not use", yet he's circled "No" to the question about turning it off and attaching a label.

    So has the boiler been isolated?   Is your mother still using it?  According to that notice, she shouldn't be doing so. 
  • Exactly very contradictory.  The stickers are on the boiler!  Yes. Mum Is able to use the boiler.  The boiler has not been isolated.  The other document the engineer issued says warning notice issued and then a note again about the flue being too close to the vent 🤦‍♀️🙈
  • Aylesbury_Duck
    Aylesbury_Duck Posts: 16,286 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Anita277 said:
    Exactly very contradictory.  The stickers are on the boiler!  Yes. Mum Is able to use the boiler.  The boiler has not been isolated.  The other document the engineer issued says warning notice issued and then a note again about the flue being too close to the vent 🤦‍♀️🙈
    What is the "vent" described?  Is it an open-able window, or an airbrick-type vent which is permanently open?  It seems strange to describe it as unsafe but not to isolate it.  Are you sure the reason for the stickers is related to the flue position, or are there two problems, perhaps?

    I'm not qualified to give gas safety advice, but I definitely advise your mother not to use that boiler until it's been properly looked at and deemed to be safe.  The technician looks to have been negligent in the way he's acted contrary to his own paperwork.  You need to get someone out urgently to look at it before your mother uses it, just in case it's genuinely unsafe.   At the moment, it's all very ambiguous.
  • Vent has not been described as anything else at all on either one of the paperwork, has circled on the paperwork visual checks and the flue information is again too close to vent. Then at the bottom of the paperwork it asks if warning notice issued? Yes /no . Circled yes 
    Has these words ID /AR/NCS For them to circle she has done AR circled then notes again for Flue. I am just drafting email complaint 
  • Aylesbury_Duck
    Aylesbury_Duck Posts: 16,286 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Anita277 said:
    Vent has not been described as anything else at all on either one of the paperwork, has circled on the paperwork visual checks and the flue information is again too close to vent. Then at the bottom of the paperwork it asks if warning notice issued? Yes /no . Circled yes 
    Has these words ID /AR/NCS For them to circle she has done AR circled then notes again for Flue. I am just drafting email complaint 
    What is the vent they're referring to?  Presumably you've seen it or know what it might be?  

    Again, I think you need to switch priorities.  Drafting a complaint email should be secondary to finding a gas technician to come out and say it's safe to use, or make it safe to use.  Allowing your mother to run a boiler whose safety status is unknown whilst you try and get responses from various insurers and gas people is the wrong way to go about it.
  • Being pedantic, I would suggest a missing "o" makes that read totally differently! B)
  • ss2020jd
    ss2020jd Posts: 652 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 2 November 2022 at 9:38AM

    Hi this seems to be a common problem if you look at the recent reviews of LIM.  

    It looks like they may be winding down.



    You could try your credit card company if you paid any charges/excesses or the policy itself that way.

    Otherwise if you have legal cover on your home insurance you could contact them for advice and see if they can advise. 

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 23,039 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Anita277 said:
    This is what was in the paperwork 
    But who is this from?
    Is the the one from the boiler policy, or from the person that fixed the boiler?

    As it really is what the one that fixed it that matters. If they have made no mention of the problem. Then you have a complaint.
    Life in the slow lane
  • Jumblebumble
    Jumblebumble Posts: 2,071 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 November 2022 at 1:56PM
    Anita277 said:
    I believe it comes under the consumer rights.  Correct me if I am wrong please. First time addressing something like this. 

    We took out a homemade standard cover policy with Home emergency assist for the boiler,heating,plumbing and electrics.  Paid the full annual payment in January 2022. So far no gas service/annual service.  We have had a problem with the boiler in regards to pressure and error messages  and water leaks. It's my mums home. Pension age. Lives alone has had 2 strokes. 
    So called the company on 30th September.  They sent someone out 1st October (3rd party contractor) advised some parts needed and someone to call back in 24 hours. 
    The claims department who sent engineer out didn't call back until 19th October.  When they stated they do not work with the manufacturer IDEAL.  We input the boiler make and model upon taking out the policy.  
    I was then advised that we had to pay for a fixed price repair  ( this we may be able to claim back ) 
    The Ideal team then advised they do not or cannot sort the water leak and we need to get a plumber  in the interim, before the engineer for the actual repair isn't going to come out until 26th October.  
    I've tried to call and complain to Home emergency assist and I've been going round and round in circles.  They asked me to contact the company LIM who the claim is now with. Despite having a conversation with someone from this department on Monday 24th October who advised a manager would call me Tuesday.  They according to my call today 26th October  have no notes of this. 
    I'm at a loss of what to do. If anyone can advise.  These people have just taken money and not delivered any service 
    This will not help you but may help others In the case of some  companies offering insured repairs
    The First issue here is that the engineers first job is to try to find an excuse why not to fix the problem The second issue is that the engineers are the most inexperienced made up of chaps who have just qualified as a gas engineer as any engineer with a bit of experience will not go around attending to calls for £40.00 or whatever the insurance companies pay.
     I know this is true as a good mate of mine worked with this type of company for the first 6 months following his qualification
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.