We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Review my defence. I won! Another one bites the dust!
Options
Comments
-
Well done on your win
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.1 -
Nice win. The bit that I picked out pretty much sums up a lot of cases:
The claimant tried to turn it into something else about how so many people had seen the sign that day but the judge said list of people who have seen it does not include the list of everyone who hasn't seen.
This can be applied to other principles such as when they try saying that the machines or payment apps work because x amount of people have used them that day. It can be applied to other factors regarding signs and T&Cs etc.8
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards