We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Should i lock into a fixed deal before today's announcement?

2

Comments

  • Just watching BBCNews, and looks like the EPG is changing possibly from April 2023, sigh. This government is just none stop drama. Sooner we get rid of the tories the better!


  • Mstty
    Mstty Posts: 4,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 17 October 2022 at 10:09AM
    interesting but not unexpected 
  • Ant555
    Ant555 Posts: 1,603 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 17 October 2022 at 2:08PM
    Killing it off now is political suicide!

    Its almost as if Liz Truss said to Jeremy Hunt,
    "Jez, Please will you become the Chancellor for a few days and do whatever you need to do to get me out of this flipping job!, I will vote for you as next leader if you do this for me, Thanks, LT"
  • Swipe
    Swipe Posts: 5,829 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Great, just in time for when my 2 year fix ends
  • Just watching BBCNews, and looks like the EPG is changing possibly from April 2023, sigh. This government is just none stop drama. Sooner we get rid of the tories the better!


    And then we will get another kind of drama.

    The quality of the current crop of politicians in the UK is the worst for many a generation.
  • Astria
    Astria Posts: 1,448 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    I don't know why they couldn't just say that energy usage for a typical household, say 12000 kWh is capped, and anything over that is at the current market rate. So the typical household would still have an annual bill of £2500 and people would be more inclined to keep a check on there actual usage if the cost doubles afterwards!
  • Ally_E.
    Ally_E. Posts: 396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Astria said:
    I don't know why they couldn't just say that energy usage for a typical household, say 12000 kWh is capped, and anything over that is at the current market rate. So the typical household would still have an annual bill of £2500 and people would be more inclined to keep a check on there actual usage if the cost doubles afterwards!
    it's not typical household, it's average usage between families in 3 bed houses+ and singletons in studios and 1 bed flats
  • Ultrasonic
    Ultrasonic Posts: 4,265 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 17 October 2022 at 12:27PM
    Ally_E. said:
    Astria said:
    I don't know why they couldn't just say that energy usage for a typical household, say 12000 kWh is capped, and anything over that is at the current market rate. So the typical household would still have an annual bill of £2500 and people would be more inclined to keep a check on there actual usage if the cost doubles afterwards!
    it's not typical household, it's average usage between families in 3 bed houses+ and singletons in studios and 1 bed flats
    No, it's a 'typical household' in the sense of being approximately the median usage of all households (with data from extremely low use cases ignored, with the intention of ignoring empty properties I believe).
  • Ally_E.
    Ally_E. Posts: 396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Ally_E. said:
    Astria said:
    I don't know why they couldn't just say that energy usage for a typical household, say 12000 kWh is capped, and anything over that is at the current market rate. So the typical household would still have an annual bill of £2500 and people would be more inclined to keep a check on there actual usage if the cost doubles afterwards!
    it's not typical household, it's average usage between families in 3 bed houses+ and singletons in studios and 1 bed flats
    No, it's a 'typical household' in the sense of being approximately the median usage of all households (with data from extremely low use cases ignored, with the intention of ignoring empty properties I believe).
    I don't how you can call a single person living in 1 bed flat a typical household, or a 5 family member one. Typical household is a 3 bed house with 2.5 people living it and according to Ofgem's archetypes, they will be using more than 12,000kW of gas per year. So the median does include low users, just disregards the lowest and highest 5% like is often done is such calculations. Ignoring just the empty properties, but counting singles is not exactly a representation of typical household.
  • Ally_E. said:
    Ally_E. said:
    Astria said:
    I don't know why they couldn't just say that energy usage for a typical household, say 12000 kWh is capped, and anything over that is at the current market rate. So the typical household would still have an annual bill of £2500 and people would be more inclined to keep a check on there actual usage if the cost doubles afterwards!
    it's not typical household, it's average usage between families in 3 bed houses+ and singletons in studios and 1 bed flats
    No, it's a 'typical household' in the sense of being approximately the median usage of all households (with data from extremely low use cases ignored, with the intention of ignoring empty properties I believe).
    I don't how you can call a single person living in 1 bed flat a typical household, or a 5 family member one. Typical household is a 3 bed house with 2.5 people living it and according to Ofgem's archetypes, they will be using more than 12,000kW of gas per year. So the median does include low users, just disregards the lowest and highest 5% like is often done is such calculations. Ignoring just the empty properties, but counting singles is not exactly a representation of typical household.
    No, the median doesn't disregard the lowest and highest 5%.  It is very simply lining up everyone in order from least to most usage and taking the person in the middle of the line.  Excluding empty houses is sensible in that approach.  The word 'typical' comes directly from the OFGEM label for that median calculation - Typical Domestic Consumption Values.

    The archetypes are simply a set of different households that could be used to determine the range of impacts of policy options.  They were dropped at the end of that research study and there has been no suggestion that they will be revived.  Nobody every attempted to say that one of that set was 'typical'.  Why did you decide 'typical' is 2.5 people and 3 bed?  Who did you decide to include and exclude to get to that figure?  You appear to be advocating against including singles at least!
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.