We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
BOE & Pensions Collapse?
Comments
-
my advice is to top watching the MSM news, especially the BBC1
-
At first I thought "what were they doing?" about this issue. But when you consider that the liabilities of pension funds go down so much when interest rates go up - (e.g. look at the cost falling massively on the open market to buy a bulk annuity to cover payments to pensioners) - it makes sense to get involved in this kind of hedging, because the alternative is to move between positions of being badly underfunded and then hugely overfunded as the interest rate cycle plays out.
I suppose it might have been overdone to some extent, but the principle seems sound.0 -
I’m 59, with my USS pensionMentioned in article below.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11317867/Growing-fears-Gordon-Browns-pensions-timebomb-finally-explode.html
1 -
Thanks, just checked and she is entitled to £145 per week and I am entitled to £185 it looks like.
What exactly does each forecast say?
0 -
That looks like a lazy, mashed-up article (who'd have thought from Mail Online) - https://www.uss.co.uk/news-and-views/latest-news/2022/10/10102022_uss-statement-in-response-to-recent-media-coverage-on-ldi-strategies ; - but at least we're reminded it's all Gordon Brown's faultxylophone said:I’m 59, with my USS pensionMentioned in article below.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11317867/Growing-fears-Gordon-Browns-pensions-timebomb-finally-explode.html
USS claim they knew all about this, were tracking, were not a 'forced seller' at all and have turned this into positive opportunity (actively acquiring at "good prices" in recent weeks);
USS has other deficit (& stakeholder) issues- but not liquidity recently and right now1 -
Apparently DB pensions in the US and Canada did not use these derivatives. The choice was there; British companies made the wrong one.DaveMcG said:At first I thought "what were they doing?" about this issue. But when you consider that the liabilities of pension funds go down so much when interest rates go up - (e.g. look at the cost falling massively on the open market to buy a bulk annuity to cover payments to pensioners) - it makes sense to get involved in this kind of hedging, because the alternative is to move between positions of being badly underfunded and then hugely overfunded as the interest rate cycle plays out.
I suppose it might have been overdone to some extent, but the principle seems sound.
In my mind, change in interest rates shouldn’t impact DB pension funds. They have a pool of clients, a good handle on size and duration of liabilities and they need to match these by taking out bonds. If interest rates rise then both liabilities and assets drop but its irrelevant as they still match. But I am just speculating.0 -
And the good news (10 days ago):
https://www.xpsgroup.com/news-views/press-releases/uk-pension-schemes-soar-surplus-gilt-yields-rise-following-chancellors-budget/
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards