We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Defence review
Comments
-
Changed to this...
It is denied the Defendant was driving the vehicle in question at the time the Parking Charge Notice was issued.
1 -
If you were not the driver, how do you know what the signs did or didn't state? Were you perhaps an occupant of the car but hubby was driving or did you question the driver after you received the NTK? Need to make it clear for the judge.1
-
Le_Kirk said:If you were not the driver, how do you know what the signs did or didn't state? Were you perhaps an occupant of the car but hubby was driving or did you question the driver after you received the NTK? Need to make it clear for the judge.
I see, so if I add ‘On receiving the NTK, the defendant asked the driver who states….’ That would make it clearer?
0 -
Yep, or you could have gone back to the car park to check yourself. Do you have your own photos of the signs on site, although the stock ones that UKPC seem to place in their eventual WS are often blurry and somewhat bleached out. That's helpful to you.Help_a_girl_out said:Le_Kirk said:If you were not the driver, how do you know what the signs did or didn't state? Were you perhaps an occupant of the car but hubby was driving or did you question the driver after you received the NTK? Need to make it clear for the judge.I see, so if I add ‘On receiving the NTK, the defendant asked the driver who states….’ That would make it clearer?
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street1 -
Yes, perfectly clear to me or, as @Umkomaas writes you did some research.Help_a_girl_out said:Le_Kirk said:If you were not the driver, how do you know what the signs did or didn't state? Were you perhaps an occupant of the car but hubby was driving or did you question the driver after you received the NTK? Need to make it clear for the judge.I see, so if I add ‘On receiving the NTK, the defendant asked the driver who states….’ That would make it clearer?
1 -
The above is a photo taken by my husband at the time.
The below is a photo sent to me as part of the SAR
0 -
My Defence as it currently stands. Any further advice would be welcomed, or indeed if it's ready to go, please let me know
IN THE COUNTY COURT
Claim No.:
Between
UK Parking Control Ltd
(Claimant)
- and -
(Defendant)
_________________
DEFENCE
1. The parking charges referred to in this claim did not arise from any agreement of terms. The charge and the claim was an unexpected shock. The Defendant denies that the Claimant is entitled to relief in the sum claimed, or at all. It is denied that any conduct by the driver was a breach of any prominent term and it is denied that this Claimant (understood to have a bare licence as managers) has standing to sue or form contracts in their own name. Liability is denied, whether or not the Claimant is claiming 'keeper liability', which is unclear from the Particulars.
The facts as known to the Defendant:
2. It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper of the vehicle in question.
It is denied the Defendant was driving the vehicle in question at the time the Parking Charge Notice was issued.
The driver of the vehicle was, in fact, the Husband of the Defendant.
3. On 28/04/2017 the driver of the vehicle in question was attending the local shopping centre. On receiving the NTK (Notice to Keeper), the Defendant enquired with the driver, who stated they did not see any external signage upon entry to the car park, nor did they see any obvious signage in the vicinity of where the vehicle was parked. Having used the adjacent car park a number of times previously (and with no conspicuous signage to suggest otherwise) the driver believed that this car park operated under the same contract.
Statement of Truth
I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Defendant’s signature:
Date:
0 -
What was the PCN issued for, remind us? Overstay?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
It was ‘parked in a permit area without displaying a valid petmit’0
-
Ok, how does an arriving visitor go about getting a permit for that place? Inside some of the premises?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


