We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Multi Asset 60/40
Comments
-
7% annualised or 7% total? VLS60 is up about 45% in 7 years, with inflation only about 23% in the same time period. Though I guess if you've contributed most of the funds more recently then the return will be lower (but so will the inflation - you'd have had to invest only very recently to return a real terms decrease I'd have thought?)Kendall80 said:
Picking start/end dates I know but i'm only 7% up in 7 years to date - a real terms decrease.
0 -
My VLS60 is -11.5% since i opened it at the end of january. Add on inflation and it another -8% or so. Ive stopped contributing. I could contribute more to bring the average unit cost down but i'm thinking i should have gone in VLS100. Its for ten years!0
-
VLS60 is now only up 3.52% annualised over the last 5 years and 6.53% annualised over the last 10 years.InvesterJones said:
7% annualised or 7% total? VLS60 is up about 45% in 7 years, with inflation only about 23% in the same time period. Though I guess if you've contributed most of the funds more recently then the return will be lower (but so will the inflation - you'd have had to invest only very recently to return a real terms decrease I'd have thought?)Kendall80 said:
Picking start/end dates I know but i'm only 7% up in 7 years to date - a real terms decrease.
At the end of 2020 VLS60 over the previous 5 years from then (2015 to 2020) it had been 9.12% annualised.0 -
What significance are you attributing to ‘ten years!’?Collyflower1 said:…but i'm thinking i should have gone in VLS100. Its for ten years!0 -
Not just the UK 60/40's struggling in the USA the typical fund is having its worst YTD in 100 years. Note annual performance is around 80/20 up so realistically next year should be better ?
FfCzPxwXwAA2QPg (900×735) (twimg.com)
Set the chart to 10 years see the effects on bonds.
Vanguard U.K. Gilt UCITS ETF summary price and performance data – Investors Chronicle
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulation summary price and performance data – Investors Chronicle
A long-term view of UK base rates and inflation. Took around 30 years to hit a peak and another 30 years to fall to near zero. As shock inflation soared after covid base rates have followed and still a way to go. It's the pace of increase which has been dramatic.
base-rates-vs-inflation.jpg (727×514) (netdna-ssl.com)
0 -
^^^ @coastline those charts are quite an eye-opener aren't they?
I never thought I would see a day when a "reduced risk" portfolio of stocks/bonds would suffer like it has this year, it appears to be truly exceptional. For cautious investors, that chose a balanced portfolio and have become used to the steady nature of performance over the last 10 years, this year must be quite a shocker.1 -
Not just the UK 60/40's struggling in the USA the typical fund is having its worst YTD in 100 years. Note annual performance is around 80/20 up so realistically next year should be better ?That chart show us the annual performances of such a fund and compares it with this year’s YTD. It compares apples with part of an apple. Waiting until December 31 would have had validity, but a recovery might have occurred by then and spoiled the story. Or it could have compared this year’s YTD with every other years’ ‘year to mid-October’, and that would have been similarly fatuous.
FfCzPxwXwAA2QPg (900×735) (twimg.com)1 -
It seems to me that all types of investments have lurched from one crisis to another over the past 15 years. We had the 2008 financial meltdown end-of-the-world crisis, then the 2020 covid end-of-the-world crisis, now we've got the 2022 energy etc end-of-the-world-crisis.GazzaBloom said:^^^ @coastline those charts are quite an eye-opener aren't they?
I never thought I would see a day when a "reduced risk" portfolio of stocks/bonds would suffer like it has this year, it appears to be truly exceptional. For cautious investors, that chose a balanced portfolio and have become used to the steady nature of performance over the last 10 years, this year must be quite a shocker.0 -
Year-end figures may be worse...who knows?JohnWinder said:Not just the UK 60/40's struggling in the USA the typical fund is having its worst YTD in 100 years. Note annual performance is around 80/20 up so realistically next year should be better ?That chart show us the annual performances of such a fund and compares it with this year’s YTD. It compares apples with part of an apple. Waiting until December 31 would have had validity, but a recovery might have occurred by then and spoiled the story. Or it could have compared this year’s YTD with every other years’ ‘year to mid-October’, and that would have been similarly fatuous.
FfCzPxwXwAA2QPg (900×735) (twimg.com)0 -
Hopefully to give time for the fund to smooth out volatility and keep up with inflation. Maybe too optimistic and should be left for 15? I'm 60 though so i may not make it!JohnWinder said:
What significance are you attributing to ‘ten years!’?Collyflower1 said:…but i'm thinking i should have gone in VLS100. Its for ten years!0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
