Fixed Rate energy Tariff lower than cap - DD to be reduced from 1st October How does that work?

[Deleted User]

Well, the third word there, wrf, is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Ultrasonic

[Deleted User] said:

Well, the third word there is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Which post were you referring to here?

[Deleted User]

Ultrasonic said:

Deleted_User said:

Well, the third word there is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Which post were you referring to here?

Everyone's friend wrf, with their continued insistence that everything is predatory, malicious or otherwise run by The Man.

Didn't quote it because I didn't feel like seeing it repeated.

QrizB

[Deleted User] said:

Ultrasonic said:

Deleted_User said:

Well, the third word there is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Which post were you referring to here?

Everyone's friend wrf, with their continued insistence that everything is predatory, malicious or otherwise run by The Man.
Didn't quote it because I didn't feel like seeing it repeated.

I think that poster must be on my ignore list. Might be on Ultrasonic's too?

Ultrasonic

QrizB said:

[Deleted User] said:

Ultrasonic said:

Deleted_User said:

Well, the third word there is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Which post were you referring to here?

Everyone's friend wrf, with their continued insistence that everything is predatory, malicious or otherwise run by The Man.
Didn't quote it because I didn't feel like seeing it repeated.

I think that poster must be on my ignore list. Might be on Ultrasonic's too?

Actually not for what it's worth, but @[Deleted User]'s post immediately followed one from the OP and I was hoping to head off possible misunderstanding. 

[Deleted User]

Ultrasonic said:

QrizB said:

[Deleted User] said:

Ultrasonic said:

Deleted_User said:

Well, the third word there is great evidence to ignore the rest of the comment.

It's a shame, because you actually make a sensible point for once - this is likely to be outside the scope of expectation for the design of the billing system.  That was one argument for the "take the full DD and then refund £66 a couple of days afterwards" arrangement that some of the suppliers are doing.

Which post were you referring to here?

Everyone's friend wrf, with their continued insistence that everything is predatory, malicious or otherwise run by The Man.
Didn't quote it because I didn't feel like seeing it repeated.

I think that poster must be on my ignore list. Might be on Ultrasonic's too?

Actually not for what it's worth, but @[Deleted User]'s post immediately followed one from the OP and I was hoping to head off possible misunderstanding. 

Yes, that's my fault for leaving the page open while I made coffee!