We are born naked, wet and hungry...Then things get worse.
.withdrawal, NOT withdrawel ..bear with me, NOT bare with me .definitely, NOT definately ......separate, NOT seperate
should have, NOT should of .....guaranteed, NOT guarenteed
I sent it via the app. I can’t be certain unfortunately what the payee check said. It was my sort code apart from 1 digit. The UK Chase branch finally told me it belonged to the Frankfurt bank.
The app should still show what the sort code was - my question was more about running it through one of the many online sort code checkers to ascertain who owns it. I don't believe that a six digit UK sort code can relate directly to a non-UK bank - was it just Chase (not in the loop directly here) who told you about JPM Frankfurt or did Santander refer to them too?
I tan it through a sort code checker & it said JP Morgan. It was Chase yes who told me it belonged to JPM Frankfurt not Santander.
I I can’t actually believe this folks!! I have gone to check my bank for the sort code I used & the money is in!!! Over a month later & with them telling me they couldn’t do anything further. The stress I have been through. How can this just magically appear? I have not heard a single thing from either bank today informing me. It’s says Non Client Access. Does that mean it has been rejected. Or have the countless emails & calls done something, ha?!?
I I can’t actually believe this folks!! I have gone to check my bank for the sort code I used & the money is in!!! Over a month later & with them telling me they couldn’t do anything further. The stress I have been through. How can this just magically appear? I have not heard a single thing from either bank today informing me. It’s says Non Client Access. Does that mean it has been rejected. Or have the countless emails & calls done something, ha?!?
Good news!
It's a hard way to learn that banks can be rubbish when things go wrong, but I guess you will take more care next time.
I I can’t actually believe this folks!! I have gone to check my bank for the sort code I used & the money is in!!! Over a month later & with them telling me they couldn’t do anything further. The stress I have been through. How can this just magically appear? I have not heard a single thing from either bank today informing me. It’s says Non Client Access. Does that mean it has been rejected. Or have the countless emails & calls done something, ha?!?
Good news!
It's a hard way to learn that banks can be rubbish when things go wrong, but I guess you will take more care next time.
I’ve certainly learned to be more careful. Thanks to everyone who took the time to respond.
We had a similar issue sending funds from Santander to Virgin, we sent money to my wife's Virgin account number but my Virgin sort code (again a single digit different). Santander did the recall, I also contacted Virgin and they confirmed (eventually) that they definitely wouldn't have the same account number with a different one of their own sort codes so I assumed it would return quickly or even end up in the intended location but nothing happened. We chased both banks repeatedly but when we'd resigned ourselves to losing the money it appeared back at Santander, there is a maximum time for a response to a recall (I think it might be 6 weeks) and Virgin had held the money for the maximum time before returning it.
It's such a nightmare transferring to a bank that doesn't provide information for the check to work so you have to proceed without a check. This was my own mistake but I can't help thinking that in circumstances where the destination account doesn't even exist at all the money should bounce straight back. It would also be helpful if the receiving bank validated on name as well as sort code and account.
We had a similar issue sending funds from Santander to Virgin, we sent money to my wife's Virgin account number but my Virgin sort code (again a single digit different). Santander did the recall, I also contacted Virgin and they confirmed (eventually) that they definitely wouldn't have the same account number with a different one of their own sort codes so I assumed it would return quickly or even end up in the intended location but nothing happened. We chased both banks repeatedly but when we'd resigned ourselves to losing the money it appeared back at Santander, there is a maximum time for a response to a recall (I think it might be 6 weeks) and Virgin had held the money for the maximum time before returning it.
It's such a nightmare transferring to a bank that doesn't provide information for the check to work so you have to proceed without a check. This was my own mistake but I can't help thinking that in circumstances where the destination account doesn't even exist at all the money should bounce straight back. It would also be helpful if the receiving bank validated on name as well as sort code and account.
I completely agree & I was not aware it could take at least 6 weeks to bounce back. The banks do really seem to withhold info or is it because they just don’t want to help? Definitely need further validation on both ends. Mistakes do happen but this just seems like it could have been resolved much easier, as I’m sure a lot do.
Replies
Sent money to the wrong bank account? Now it should be easier to get it back.
.withdrawal, NOT withdrawel ..bear with me, NOT bare with me
.definitely, NOT definately ......separate, NOT seperate
should have, NOT should of .....guaranteed, NOT guarenteed
It's a hard way to learn that banks can be rubbish when things go wrong, but I guess you will take more care next time.
It's such a nightmare transferring to a bank that doesn't provide information for the check to work so you have to proceed without a check. This was my own mistake but I can't help thinking that in circumstances where the destination account doesn't even exist at all the money should bounce straight back. It would also be helpful if the receiving bank validated on name as well as sort code and account.
It would be the receiving bank who got agreement from the account holder to return the money.