IMPORTANT REMINDER: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information. If you are uploading images, please take extra care that you have redacted all personal information.
Motor insurance after an accident

118 Posts


in Motoring
My car was a write-off, the other party has accepted full responsibility, he's pleaded guilty to driving without due care and his insurers have paid up for the vehicle (injury compensation yet to come). The other driver came round a blind bend, too fast, out of control and on the wrong side of the road 10 yards in front of me resulting in a 60mph+ not quite head-on collision
I had renewed my insurance a few days before the accident (for £220). A few weeks later, when I bought the replacement car (very similar to the old one, a newer model with better safety features) I contacted the insurer expecting a small admin charge for changing the details but they asked for £130, I didn't argue as the girl on the phone was difficult to communicate with - not very bright. Anyway I think my premium is very competitive and they'd been quite good at handling the incident.
6 weeks later I got an urgent request to call them. This was to tell me they wanted another £180. I asked why since I had a protected 20 year no claims discount and police had confirmed I was not at fault, the guy put me on hold for a bit and came back with a request for £65 which I paid because at least it was less than £180!
So my insurance for this year adds up to about £415. My question is have I been screwed or is it "normal" to have to pay what seems like a penalty for having the misfortune to be the innocent party in a collision? I've not been in this situation before, other people have told me I can expect a significantly higher premium next year despite being the innocent party.
I had renewed my insurance a few days before the accident (for £220). A few weeks later, when I bought the replacement car (very similar to the old one, a newer model with better safety features) I contacted the insurer expecting a small admin charge for changing the details but they asked for £130, I didn't argue as the girl on the phone was difficult to communicate with - not very bright. Anyway I think my premium is very competitive and they'd been quite good at handling the incident.
6 weeks later I got an urgent request to call them. This was to tell me they wanted another £180. I asked why since I had a protected 20 year no claims discount and police had confirmed I was not at fault, the guy put me on hold for a bit and came back with a request for £65 which I paid because at least it was less than £180!
So my insurance for this year adds up to about £415. My question is have I been screwed or is it "normal" to have to pay what seems like a penalty for having the misfortune to be the innocent party in a collision? I've not been in this situation before, other people have told me I can expect a significantly higher premium next year despite being the innocent party.
0
Latest MSE News and Guides
Childcare budget boost
More support for children from nine months and those on Universal Credit
MSE News
Replies
I've had 2 non fault claims and my premium cost did not increase.
I experienced a rise in premium too a few years ago when I got rear-ended while stationary in London traffic. It turns out that regardless of fault, making a claim in most cases results in an increase in premium albeit not as much as the at-fault driver.
Statistically, drivers who are involved in an accident are more likely to be involved in another accident at a later stage so you’re deemed a slightly higher risk. As it turns out, I was rear-ended again within the next 12 months of the last one but this time in stationary traffic on the M25 (it was a light shunt). Needless to say, I avoided the insurers on that instance.
(except air quality and Medical Science
A friend successfully did this so it can be done
I wonder if what actually happened here is the renewal quote was issued 2 to 3 weeks prior to renewal date. Op accepted the renewal but then had an accident before the renewal date. This would have changed the terms of the renewal requiring the op to inform the insurer of the accident ahead of the renewal. If the op failed to tell the insurers and they later found out about the accident they would be entitled to review the renewal quote to reflect the actual facts at renewal date.