We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ERC - unlawful penalty?
Options

hewhohuntselves
Posts: 58 Forumite


Hi. I understand that English law generally prohibits penalties which are unrelated to actual (or expected) loss. On that basis, how is a fixed ERC not an unlawful penalty? Especially in the case of remortgaging with the same lender at a higher fixed rate.
Thanks!
Thanks!
0
Comments
-
When a mortgage provider sells a fixed mortgage, they will hedge the risk of interest rates rising using swaps of equivalent term (in aggregate). Also, the mortgage provider will lose out on interest due for the remainder of the fixed term. It probably costs more than £1000 to arrange a mortgage too.
I presume the fixed ERC would bear in mind the magnitude of these expected losses, otherwise, as you say the clause would be unfair.Pensions actuary, Runner, Dog parent, Homeowner1 -
hewhohuntselves said:Hi. I understand that English law generally prohibits penalties which are unrelated to actual (or expected) loss. On that basis, how is a fixed ERC not an unlawful penalty? Especially in the case of remortgaging with the same lender at a higher fixed rate.
Punitive damages aren't generally allowed under the law in E&W which therefore means penalties must be broadly aligned to costs (which can include loss of profits) however this can be done on an average basis and in recent years the courts have been more convinced by the arguments that there is benefits to both sides of having a fixed cost agreed up front for breach of contract than the uncertainty of unspecified damages.
However you are not talking about damages for breach of contract but instead an exit fee and the laws around these sorts of things are much weaker.
You aren't the first one to complain though so there are plenty of cases not upheld on the ombudsman website like https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN2660666.pdf0 -
You signed up for it. Nothing unfair in an ERC.2
-
Edi81 said:You signed up for it. Nothing unfair in an ERC.
And thanks to everyone else for the replies!0 -
Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-
"In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.
It can insure against that in various ways, but there’s a cost either to having the borrowing end early – or to protect against those costs. As a result, fixed rate mortgages include a clause in the mortgage agreement which allows the borrower to exit the mortgage early – but only in return for paying an ERC. The purpose of the ERC is to compensate the lender for the early end of the fixed rate period. Repaying a mortgage early isn’t a breach of the contract, it’s something specifically allowed for, as long as the borrower pays the charge for doing so. The rules of mortgage regulation include provisions about ERCs. In summary, they say that an ERC must be able to be expressed as a cash value, and must be a reasonable pre-estimate of the costs resulting from early termination of the mortgage. Subject to that, there’s no restriction on how a lender calculates its ERC and, crucially, a lender is allowed to estimate the risk and costs of early termination across a group of mortgages; it doesn’t have to do so on an individual basis. So a lender can calculate its ERCs based on a reasonable pre-estimate of the costs of early termination of a group of mortgages – not on the actual cost, or estimated cost, of a borrower ending their individual mortgage early."
Details of a number of such complaints can be seen here;-
https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decisions-case-studies/ombudsman-decisions
I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.6 -
"The purpose of the ERC is to compensate the lender for the early end of the fixed rate period. I don’t agree that it’s a penalty – which has a strict meaning in law (a charge levied for breaching a contract). Repaying a mortgage early isn’t a breach of the contract, it’s something specifically allowed for, as long as the borrower pays the charge for doing so."
I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.6 -
kingstreet said:Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-
"In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.
I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.0 -
Smudger74 said:kingstreet said:Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-
"In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.
I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
Smudger74 said:kingstreet said:Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-
"In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.
I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards