We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ERC - unlawful penalty?

Options
Hi.  I understand that English law generally prohibits penalties which are unrelated to actual (or expected) loss.  On that basis, how is a fixed ERC not an unlawful penalty?  Especially in the case of remortgaging with the same lender at a higher fixed rate.

Thanks!

Comments

  • biscan25
    biscan25 Posts: 452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When a mortgage provider sells a fixed mortgage, they will hedge the risk of interest rates rising using swaps of equivalent term (in aggregate). Also, the mortgage provider will lose out on interest due for the remainder of the fixed term. It probably costs more than £1000 to arrange a mortgage too.
    I presume the fixed ERC would bear in mind the magnitude of these expected losses, otherwise, as you say the clause would be unfair.
    Pensions actuary, Runner, Dog parent, Homeowner
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hi.  I understand that English law generally prohibits penalties which are unrelated to actual (or expected) loss.  On that basis, how is a fixed ERC not an unlawful penalty?  Especially in the case of remortgaging with the same lender at a higher fixed rate.
    Do you mean English Law or the Law of England and Wales?

    Punitive damages aren't generally allowed under the law in E&W which therefore means penalties must be broadly aligned to costs (which can include loss of profits) however this can be done on an average basis and in recent years the courts have been more convinced by the arguments that there is benefits to both sides of having a fixed cost agreed up front for breach of contract than the uncertainty of unspecified damages.

    However you are not talking about damages for breach of contract but instead an exit fee and the laws around these sorts of things are much weaker. 

    You aren't the first one to complain though so there are plenty of cases not upheld on the ombudsman website like https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/decision/DRN2660666.pdf 
  • Edi81
    Edi81 Posts: 1,501 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You signed up for it. Nothing unfair in an ERC. 
  • Edi81 said:
    You signed up for it. Nothing unfair in an ERC. 
    Just because someone signs up to something does not (a) mean it is lawful or (b) that it is fair... Hence the reams of consumer protection legislation / guidance existing in the UK!

    And thanks to everyone else for the replies!
  • Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-

    "In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.

    I am in a situation where I have completed my repayments for the mortgage term on the 1st of the month because I prefer my payments go out at the beginning. My officla term ends on the 31st. How is it the mortgage company loses out financially that they have to charge me £1250 early repayment? 

    I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Smudger74 said:
    Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-

    "In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.

    I am in a situation where I have completed my repayments for the mortgage term on the 1st of the month because I prefer my payments go out at the beginning. My officla term ends on the 31st. How is it the mortgage company loses out financially that they have to charge me £1250 early repayment? 

    I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.
    The contract will be date specific.   You are just the wrong side of that date.  If the date was changed by a month, then someone else will just be the wrong side of that and will also call it unfair.   That is the nature of a line in the sand.  You are either one side or the other.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,256 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Smudger74 said:
    Here is the gist of a rejected complaint to the FOS re ERCs;-

    "In very simple terms, when a lender offers a fixed rate, both the lender and borrower are tied in to the fixed rate for the whole fixed term. The lender has to raise the funds it lends out on the money markets. It has to pay for those funds – generally over the period it borrows them. It relies on income from borrowers repaying the mortgages to cover the costs of the funds it has lent. It budgets for that income based on the length and level of fixed rates. So when borrowers repay early, the lender won’t receive the income it was anticipating, and needs to service its own borrowing.

    I am in a situation where I have completed my repayments for the mortgage term on the 1st of the month because I prefer my payments go out at the beginning. My officla term ends on the 31st. How is it the mortgage company loses out financially that they have to charge me £1250 early repayment? 

    I have accepted it now but it doesn't sit right with me.
    The lender will be compensating a market counterparty who supplied the original rate-swap which made your product possible in the first place. They work to fixed parameters and there are no grey areas which can be exploited.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.