We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Joint Borrower Sole Proprietor and First Time Buyers


Neither of us have ever owned another property and so both currently would be classed as ‘first time buyers’ (along with all the bells and whistles this collects) if we were to buy in the future.
Whilst I understand that, since joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgages would not have us as listed on the deeds, and so not legally be owners, I’m not clear if this affects our future ability to claim stamp duty relief, should we seek to buy in the future once the current scenario has been worked through.
It’s of importance as I do understand also that, should we no longer be classified as first time buyers after being listed as joint borrowers, we would also render any chance of having a joint first-time buyer mortgage with partners also void.
Comments
-
mountainash123 said:Hi there,Myself and a sibling are looking to support a parent to remortgage their home with a joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgage to help them out of a tight spot.
Neither of us have ever owned another property and so both currently would be classed as ‘first time buyers’ (along with all the bells and whistles this collects) if we were to buy in the future.
Whilst I understand that, since joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgages would not have us as listed on the deeds, and so not legally be owners, I’m not clear if this affects our future ability to claim stamp duty relief, should we seek to buy in the future once the current scenario has been worked through.
It’s of importance as I do understand also that, should we no longer be classified as first time buyers after being listed as joint borrowers, we would also render any chance of having a joint first-time buyer mortgage with partners also void.Does anyone have any guidance about this?Thank you!
There are indeed scenarios in which there may be stamp duty implications for individuals not on the deeds, but it doesn't look like any of that will apply to your case.
https://www.samconveyancing.co.uk/news/conveyancing/joint-mortgage-sole-proprietor-stamp-duty-land-tax-implications-6085
I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
1 -
No impact to first time buyers SDLT Relief. You’re essentially acting as a guarantor for the bank in case the mortgage owner doesn’t keep up with payments1
-
K_S said:mountainash123 said:Hi there,Myself and a sibling are looking to support a parent to remortgage their home with a joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgage to help them out of a tight spot.
Neither of us have ever owned another property and so both currently would be classed as ‘first time buyers’ (along with all the bells and whistles this collects) if we were to buy in the future.
Whilst I understand that, since joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgages would not have us as listed on the deeds, and so not legally be owners, I’m not clear if this affects our future ability to claim stamp duty relief, should we seek to buy in the future once the current scenario has been worked through.
It’s of importance as I do understand also that, should we no longer be classified as first time buyers after being listed as joint borrowers, we would also render any chance of having a joint first-time buyer mortgage with partners also void.Does anyone have any guidance about this?Thank you!
There are indeed scenarios in which there may be stamp duty implications for individuals not on the deeds, but it doesn't look like any of that will apply to your case.
Thank you for this!
From the stipulations on that link, would the requirement to have in writing, a la 'It is also noted that in order for the joint purchasers to prove to HMRC that they have zero beneficial interest in the property that they need to "evidence this in writing". A common method for doing this is an executed deed of trust stating that the parties on the mortgage are not legal owners and have a zero beneficial interest in the property.'
to have it secured that there's no beneificial interest, or does this apply to 'traditional' joint mortgagages, rather than JBSP?
I assume that, since the JBSP will explictly state that there's no any material interest, in its model, for either of us, that should be sufficient, so no additional deed of trust be necessary?
Thank you!
0 -
mountainash123 said:K_S said:mountainash123 said:Hi there,Myself and a sibling are looking to support a parent to remortgage their home with a joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgage to help them out of a tight spot.
Neither of us have ever owned another property and so both currently would be classed as ‘first time buyers’ (along with all the bells and whistles this collects) if we were to buy in the future.
Whilst I understand that, since joint-borrower sole proprietor mortgages would not have us as listed on the deeds, and so not legally be owners, I’m not clear if this affects our future ability to claim stamp duty relief, should we seek to buy in the future once the current scenario has been worked through.
It’s of importance as I do understand also that, should we no longer be classified as first time buyers after being listed as joint borrowers, we would also render any chance of having a joint first-time buyer mortgage with partners also void.Does anyone have any guidance about this?Thank you!
There are indeed scenarios in which there may be stamp duty implications for individuals not on the deeds, but it doesn't look like any of that will apply to your case.
Thank you for this!
From the stipulations on that link, would the requirement to have in writing, a la 'It is also noted that in order for the joint purchasers to prove to HMRC that they have zero beneficial interest in the property that they need to "evidence this in writing". A common method for doing this is an executed deed of trust stating that the parties on the mortgage are not legal owners and have a zero beneficial interest in the property.'
to have it secured that there's no beneificial interest, or does this apply to 'traditional' joint mortgagages, rather than JBSP?
I assume that, since the JBSP will explictly state that there's no any material interest, in its model, for either of us, that should be sufficient, so no additional deed of trust be necessary?
I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
1 -
@K_S no problem at all- thank you!
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards