We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Car Prices

2»

Comments

  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 33,015 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My car was valued at £6k by the insurance, that was 4 years ago.

    I paid a lot less due to high miles but now it really is worth 6k even with the extra miles since purchase.
    Bonkers because a replacement is also stupidly inflated.

    Rather than getting a sub 5 year old car for my money, the cars advertised are around 9 - 12 years old.
    Seems my current car will be with me for a while.

    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

  • 400ixl said:
    What is the fascination with Punto's? Personally I have always liked the Fiat / Alfa brands, but the Punto wasn't really a reliable car from the offset, especially body wise.

    There are plenty of other cars from that era which will last a lot longer body wise than a Punto in similar price brackets.
    I've always liked Fiats and the Punto is the right size.

    When it reaches the end of its life it will be 21 years old and I never expected it to last that long. It still runs well and aside from an electronics issue around 18 months after I bought it nothing major has gone wrong with it in that sense. It's just unfortunate that the one thing that is wrong with it has proven to be fatal.

    I'm also well aware that I may not be so lucky with my next car. Once a car is 10 years old it's probably not going to last much longer. That's why I'm reluctant to spend so much money on a car that old. 
  • Goudy
    Goudy Posts: 2,396 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I can understand your preference for the Fiat Punto.

    Fiat's "FIRE" engine has been around in one sharpe or form since the mid 80's as has the rest of the running gear and they are pretty robust, fuss free and cheap to kept running.

    Older cars generally have less tech in them to go wrong, though later cars like the Grande's and Evo's did start to get some more electronics and other fancy kit on the engines to clean the emissions up a bit, along with some more modern engines like the 1.4 Multiair and 0.9 Twinair which require a bit more to keep them running right and perhaps not as robust.

    In the same vane though a bit more recent is the Dacia Sandero.
    Until recently they ran on older Renault running gear, most of which is pretty fuss free, particularly the four cylinder 1.2 non turbo engine.

    The 1.5 diesel is a really sweet workhorse that was fitted in the a lot of Nissan and Renault cars and vans, though it's a common rail so bills could be very large if it goes wrong.




Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.