We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Global index ETF or fund risk?
kerrick
Posts: 90 Forumite
Considering large assets / liquidity global index trackers, major fund managers Blackrock, Fidelity, Xtrackers, Vanguard etc.
Of course the assets are ringfenced, the risk is very low, and you can split holdings between platforms and fund managers etc. etc. But as FCA compensation is capped, in terms of potential systemic risk, is holding an ETF more risky than holding a fund?
Or not worth considering on the basis of systemic risk?
Of course the assets are ringfenced, the risk is very low, and you can split holdings between platforms and fund managers etc. etc. But as FCA compensation is capped, in terms of potential systemic risk, is holding an ETF more risky than holding a fund?
Or not worth considering on the basis of systemic risk?
0
Comments
-
But as FCA compensation is capped, in terms of potential systemic risk, is holding an ETF more risky than holding a fund?The FCA provides no compensation. The compensation scheme is from the FSCS.
ETFs do not get FSCS protection. So, by default, ETFs are higher risk than the equivalent UT/OEIC that does get FSCS protection. However, the protection is not comparable to deposit protection but some may feel it is important.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.4 -
Most ETFs are domiciled abroad, most commonly in Ireland and Luxembourg, so whatever protections or lack therof those jurisdictions supply are more relevant than Britain's.kerrick said:Considering large assets / liquidity global index trackers, major fund managers Blackrock, Fidelity, Xtrackers, Vanguard etc.
Of course the assets are ringfenced, the risk is very low, and you can split holdings between platforms and fund managers etc. etc. But as FCA compensation is capped, in terms of potential systemic risk, is holding an ETF more risky than holding a fund?
Or not worth considering on the basis of systemic risk?0 -
Many rather exotic ETF's have sprung up following all sorts of indexes and markets. In these cases I might be a bit concerned, but if you are talking about mainstream ETF's with Vanguard, Fidelity etc then the risk must be miniscule. Unless there was a global nuclear war and then you would not be worrying about ETF's anyway.kerrick said:Considering large assets / liquidity global index trackers, major fund managers Blackrock, Fidelity, Xtrackers, Vanguard etc.
Of course the assets are ringfenced, the risk is very low, and you can split holdings between platforms and fund managers etc. etc. But as FCA compensation is capped, in terms of potential systemic risk, is holding an ETF more risky than holding a fund?
Or not worth considering on the basis of systemic risk?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
