We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Unmetered water when bans kick in
Options

savers_united
Posts: 526 Forumite


in Water bills
With the talk of hose pipe bans etc being introduced and in some areas already happening do those like myself at a £80 a month unmetered property get any kind of reduction? I read today this dry weather could stretch to October so I could be looking at a few months of limited use. Although I do not waste water and a meter would likely work out cheaper it does seem a bit unfair if paying £80 a month and being forced to use less when I already am using less than £80 a months worth.
1
Comments
-
Could your water company install a metered supply?0
-
No. You always have the option to ask for a meter. Why haven't you already done so, especially if you 'know' you're using less than £80pm?0
-
I agree a meter would be cheaper and yes I can have one fitted, just prefer having a fixed cost and find it easier to budget with no nasty surprises.
Would have been nice that for the months the bans were in place there would have been a universal reduction in the monthly charge as £80 does buy alot of water / sewage per month looking at metered charges.0 -
savers_united said:I agree a meter would be cheaper and yes I can have one fitted, just prefer having a fixed cost and find it easier to budget with no nasty surprises.
1 -
It's up to the OP if they'd prefer not to save £40-50 a month by having a meter0
-
savers_united said:I agree a meter would be cheaper and yes I can have one fitted, just prefer having a fixed cost and find it easier to budget with no nasty surprises.
Would have been nice that for the months the bans were in place there would have been a universal reduction in the monthly charge as £80 does buy alot of water / sewage per month looking at metered charges.The hosepipe ban is not driven by financial pressure, but the need to save the increasing scarce resource - namely water.Using your reasoning, would you suggest those paying unmetered charges and living in a flat(and presumably not having a hosepipe) should also have a reduction?0 -
Cardew said:savers_united said:I agree a meter would be cheaper and yes I can have one fitted, just prefer having a fixed cost and find it easier to budget with no nasty surprises.
Would have been nice that for the months the bans were in place there would have been a universal reduction in the monthly charge as £80 does buy alot of water / sewage per month looking at metered charges.The hosepipe ban is not driven by financial pressure, but the need to save the increasing scarce resource - namely water.Using your reasoning, would you suggest those paying unmetered charges and living in a flat(and presumably not having a hosepipe) should also have a reduction?
Also when you buy / rent a flat you know if its possible to use a hosepipe, I guess those on ground floor could but if your in a penthouse then unlikely. I have a garden front and back, with flowerbeds etc, and although my usage is below £80 per month having gardens I do feel happier with a fixed cost and happy to pay more for that security, but do find having my use restricted which is going to see me use at most £30 per month now unfair when paying £80, happy to comply and not use the hose pipe and whatever restrictions are in place but some kind of rebate should be made in my view.0 -
savers_united said:The hosepipe ban is not driven by financial pressure, but the need to save the increasing scarce resource - namely water.Using your reasoning, would you suggest those paying unmetered charges and living in a flat(and presumably not having a hosepipe) should also have a reduction?That simply isn't the case.The Rateable Value(RV) was based on the notional rent a property could command prior to 1990 and I can assure you that the RV for flats was often higher than comparable houses as they could command a higher rent.However even if that were the case, what action do you suggest water companies should take? Inspect every property to decide on the reduction in charges? Give a blanket reduction?The obvious answer is to make metering mandatory.2
-
Cardew said:savers_united said:The hosepipe ban is not driven by financial pressure, but the need to save the increasing scarce resource - namely water.Using your reasoning, would you suggest those paying unmetered charges and living in a flat(and presumably not having a hosepipe) should also have a reduction?That simply isn't the case.The Rateable Value(RV) was based on the notional rent a property could command prior to 1990 and I can assure you that the RV for flats was often higher than comparable houses as they could command a higher rent.However even if that were the case, what action do you suggest water companies should take? Inspect every property to decide on the reduction in charges? Give a blanket reduction?The obvious answer is to make metering mandatory.
The RV is all over the place as some round my way are unmetered and paying less than £50 a month with bigger properties, more bathrooms etc. So they would be silly to move even with hosepipe ban, but for me this may be the kick I need.0 -
So we are stupid to tell most people to go onto metered? It will increase our own cost if they pay less on metered.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards