We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Online order not as discribed
Options
Comments
-
Its a c&p error from the larger size panel they sell
2.4m x 1.2m = 2.88m2
https://www.wickes.co.uk/Kingspan-TP10-Roof-Insulation-Board---2400-x-1200-x-50mm/p/180436#
1 -
taff7996 said:elsien said:You order by the number of panels, do you not? So how many panels did you order?0
-
You ordered 7 units of what was advertised as 1.20 x 0.45 = 0.54m. That is what you got.
The website mistakenly advised that would be sufficient to cover what you required.
Unfortunately, you did not check this until you received the units and saw that they were not big enough for what you wanted.
But you got sent what you ordered 1.e. 7 units of 1.20 x 0.54
Wickes have now offered to refund you for these and you can then order the correct size.0 -
OP they should either repair (not an option) or replace the goods (maybe not an option if boards of such a size don't exist).
Failing that you have the choice of either a full refund or a price reduction, guidance states that a price reduction should reflect what is paid for vs what is supplied which should be obvious to work out in this instance.
Whilst they've made a mistake I very much doubt it is one that should have been known in advance by yourself so I don't think the mistake has any bearing on your consumer rights.
If board mods are around, this probably belongs in Consumer Rights1 -
Ergates said:OP they should either repair (not an option) or replace the goods (maybe not an option if boards of such a size don't exist).
Failing that you have the choice of either a full refund or a price reduction, guidance states that a price reduction should reflect what is paid for vs what is supplied which should be obvious to work out in this instance.
Whilst they've made a mistake I very much doubt it is one that should have been known in advance by yourself so I don't think the mistake has any bearing on your consumer rights.
If board mods are around, this probably belongs in Consumer Rights
It’s unlikely the stock photo would indicate size particularly well.
Doesn’t any ambiguity in the contract favour the person who didn’t write it? If the durable information detailing the order has the same mistake I think that should favour the OP.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
But surely a refund as the goods are not suitable is adequate.0
-
sheramber said:But surely a refund as the goods are not suitable is adequate.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
Ergates said:OP they should either repair (not an option) or replace the goods (maybe not an option if boards of such a size don't exist).
Failing that you have the choice of either a full refund or a price reduction, guidance states that a price reduction should reflect what is paid for vs what is supplied which should be obvious to work out in this instance.
Whilst they've made a mistake I very much doubt it is one that should have been known in advance by yourself so I don't think the mistake has any bearing on your consumer rights.
If board mods are around, this probably belongs in Consumer Rights
It’s unlikely the stock photo would indicate size particularly well.
Doesn’t any ambiguity in the contract favour the person who didn’t write it? If the durable information detailing the order has the same mistake I think that should favour the OP.0 -
DanDare999 said:Ergates said:OP they should either repair (not an option) or replace the goods (maybe not an option if boards of such a size don't exist).
Failing that you have the choice of either a full refund or a price reduction, guidance states that a price reduction should reflect what is paid for vs what is supplied which should be obvious to work out in this instance.
Whilst they've made a mistake I very much doubt it is one that should have been known in advance by yourself so I don't think the mistake has any bearing on your consumer rights.
If board mods are around, this probably belongs in Consumer Rights
It’s unlikely the stock photo would indicate size particularly well.
Doesn’t any ambiguity in the contract favour the person who didn’t write it? If the durable information detailing the order has the same mistake I think that should favour the OP.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
If the OP is undertaking a DIY project and it isn't immediately obvious to them that 1.2m x 0.45m is never going to equal 2.88 sq m, then I'm afraid it is likely that the project will not end well...
(Mind you, when I read this in the OP it should have raised alarm bells immediately: "Each board is 1200 x 450mm, to get 2.88m coverage you need 5 panels." The OP knows this works out at 5.33, yet they think they need only 5 panels and not 6... )1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards