Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
All BPA's 'Parking on Private Land Group' (Council of Representatives) are now DRAs & litigators
It's crystal clear how weighted the BPA's response to the upcoming Public Consultation will likely be, about the false added DRA 'fees', given this appointment:
Jamie Ashford of DCBLegal (NOT A PARKING FIRM) has been added to the BPA 'Council of Representatives':
https://businesscheshire.co.uk/2022/07/27/cheshire-lawyer-appointed-to-british-parking-association-council-to-bring-positive-change/
This influential group already had ParkingEye and ZZPS and the membership now looks like this:
https://www.britishparking.co.uk/BPA-Council-Election
Parking on Private Land Group
Jamie Ashford, DCB Legal
Gary Osner, ZZPS
Mark Anfield, Parkingeye
ParkingEye are a bulk litigator in their own right. Not a DRA, but very invested in their Legal Department. Now we all know ParkingEye never add any fake 'fees' to their LBCs or court claims but of course, they stand to make around £70million more per annum if they can get this through in the Public Consultation.
Supported by Gary Osner (who boasted of inventing the added fees model 'to make more money') and the highest money-claim bulk litigator in the country, DCBLegal, it is my opinion that I am sure ParkingEye are rubbing their hands with glee at the idea of the BPA begging for the ability to add the unconscionable 'fee' enhancement that the High Court Judge in ParkingEye v Somerfield told them would be unrecoverable.
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
Comments
-
I am sure ParkingEye are rubbing their hands with glee at the idea of the BPA begging for the ability to add the unconscionable 'fee' ?
SO SAD, this makes the BPA the head honcho of the fake scam and that is serious1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
