We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
I'm 34 years old - Is it still worth it to open a LISA?
Theresonly1
Posts: 139 Forumite
I'm wouldn't be a first-time buyer and if I open a LISA it would towards my retirement.
If it is still worth opening one at my age; how much portion of my salary should I ideally put towards it?
If it is still worth opening one at my age; how much portion of my salary should I ideally put towards it?
0
Comments
-
Yes it is if the timescale fits and you are a basic rate taxpayer or lower.If it is still worth opening one at my age; how much portion of my salary should I ideally put towards it?
You should aim to maximise the £4000 allowance if possible.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
oh. i'm not a basic rate tax payer. i'm more of a high rate tax payer.0
-
I was 34 when I opened mine. As for how much you should put into it, that depends on your personal circumstances
0 -
Yes, unless you're on benefits of any sort (the 6k / 16k rule)
The cash is tax free when you withdraw it, so if you can keep it in there long enough it's a useful bridge to your retirement (after 60) as it won't feature as income in your tax returns, unlike a pension.
0 -
In which case, the tax relief available on contributions will typically make pensions a more attractive proposition than a LISA - see https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/lifetime-isas/#pension-2 for the comparison.Theresonly1 said:oh. i'm not a basic rate tax payer. i'm more of a high rate tax payer.2 -
eskbanker said:
In which case, the tax relief available on contributions will typically make pensions a more attractive proposition than a LISA - see https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/lifetime-isas/#pension-2 for the comparison.Theresonly1 said:oh. i'm not a basic rate tax payer. i'm more of a high rate tax payer.Unless any of the following apply- You're likely to reach the lifetime allowance
- You're filling the annual allowance (including carry-back)
- You're contributing enough in any year to drop out of higher rate tax
- You have yet to and intend to buy your first home
Personally I opened one later than you, mostly to get it in place before I was 40 (you can contribute until 50, but only open before 40). Pension is generally the more attractive vehicle if none of the above apply, but I'd still be inclined to open one while they exist as might be useful later.2 -
I was over 34 when opening my S&S LISA when they launched around 5 years ago.
For me it's more of a side investment account to help the kids with weddings and house deposits when I am 60+ and they will be in their 20s. As such the money doesn't form part of my retirement planning.
I've already used around half the frozen LTA and with further contributions while I am working and investment growth then there's not much scope for making more use of my pensions although I still contribute enough to avoid higher rate tax and be eligible for child benefit.
0 -
Yes, I was perhaps a little vague with 'typically', in that, as you rightly point out, there are a number of scenarios where the generalisation doesn't apply, so OP needs to research the detail as it pertains to their own specific circumstances, although has said that they've owned a home. Agree that opening a LISA, even if not funding it with anything particularly substantial initially, is a sensible precaution in order to keep options open before it's too late....pjread said:eskbanker said:
In which case, the tax relief available on contributions will typically make pensions a more attractive proposition than a LISA - see https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/lifetime-isas/#pension-2 for the comparison.Theresonly1 said:oh. i'm not a basic rate tax payer. i'm more of a high rate tax payer.Unless any of the following apply- You're likely to reach the lifetime allowance
- You're filling the annual allowance (including carry-back)
- You're contributing enough in any year to drop out of higher rate tax
- You have yet to and intend to buy your first home
Personally I opened one later than you, mostly to get it in place before I was 40 (you can contribute until 50, but only open before 40). Pension is generally the more attractive vehicle if none of the above apply, but I'd still be inclined to open one while they exist as might be useful later.1 -
thanks for all reply. very useful.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

