We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Blocking car on private land - criminal offence?
Comments
-
ilikewatch2 said:That's interesting - I guess the fact that I park in that spot every night proves that I didn't do so on Friday with the intension of preventing removal of the car, that was just an unintentional consequence of me wanting to park in my space.
And I'd have said you have the lawful authority to park across your own drive / parking space if someone else is preventing you from using it. The says you have to be blocking them without lawful authority. I cannot imagine this ever getting past the CPS to go to court. Not in the public interest to prosecute you.
Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.5 -
The copper who visited me didn't seem to think it would go any further, but I guess if they receive a complaint they still need to investigate and listen to both sides of the story.
3 -
Trespass isn't a criminal offence (fortunately) but blocking someone's car in like that is. It is probably very unlikely that a case like yours would be taken any further - especially as you put a note on the windscreen with your details so the driver could get their car released without too much difficulty.ilikewatch2 said:
I would have thought that would be a civil rather than criminal matter and outside the police remit? Mind you, I'd have thought the same about blocking a car in, but the police have certainly decided to get involved!Mr.Generous said:I'd have thought if it's your land the police should be looking at the trespass of the other motorist that deprived you of the use of your land to park on.
If they'd contacted you and you'd refused to move your van, or had demanded a fee to move it - then it might have been taken further, but that isn't what happened.
The law wasn't design to handle your circumstances - of someone parking on someone elses drive without permission. It's meant for, say, rogue wheel clampers. Or if a private carpark owner decided to block the exit then demand a release fee. Your circumstances are an unfortunate side effect - it's a pretty good example of the risks of introducing new laws, even well intentioned ones can have unintended consequences.3 -
The law is primarily aimed at wheelclampers, but it covers any method of immobilising a vehicle. Lawful authority refers to having specific authority to immobilise the vehicle (ie you're a bailiff with a warrant, or a DVLA contractor clamping an untaxed vehicle etc). It is not the same thing as there being no general prohibition on you parking at the end of your own drive. The reference to lawful authority is a red herring in this context.Mr.Generous said:ilikewatch2 said:That's interesting - I guess the fact that I park in that spot every night proves that I didn't do so on Friday with the intension of preventing removal of the car, that was just an unintentional consequence of me wanting to park in my space.
And I'd have said you have the lawful authority to park across your own drive / parking space if someone else is preventing you from using it. The says you have to be blocking them without lawful authority.
The key question is probably one of intent - are you parking there primarily with the intention of blocking him in as punishment for parking on your driveway (which would be illegal) or because it's the only possible by place you can park, and the fact that it immobilises the other guy's car is incidental (which might not be illegal)?1 -
You gave the owner of the car all the information they needed to get out - surely that shows that you didn't intend to keep their car blocked?ilikewatch2 said:On Friday neither of my vehicles was parked there, and when I returned from work there was a car I didn't recognise parked in the space where my van usually is - I knocked on a couple of neighbours doors, but no-one knew whose it was. With nowhere else to park I parked my car in its usual place which effectively blocked the other car in - I left a note on the windscreen with my address in case they needed to get their car out.
It sounds as if they didn't want to contact you because they knew they were in the wrong but then told the police a story with important bits of information left out.
2 -
It helps to show good faith on the OP's part, but it probably isn't conclusive by itself.Mojisola said:
You gave the owner of the car all the information they needed to get out - surely that shows that you didn't intend to keep their car blocked?ilikewatch2 said:On Friday neither of my vehicles was parked there, and when I returned from work there was a car I didn't recognise parked in the space where my van usually is - I knocked on a couple of neighbours doors, but no-one knew whose it was. With nowhere else to park I parked my car in its usual place which effectively blocked the other car in - I left a note on the windscreen with my address in case they needed to get their car out.
The law was explicitly aimed at banning wheel clamping (whether or not a fee is charged for release). And wheel clampers also always left all the information the owner needed to get their car unclamped - in fact that was pretty much the point of wheelclamping. So it treats deliberately immobilising a vehicle in the same way, whether you intend to keep it blocked for a few minutes or for weeks on end.1 -
I had this when I lived in Oxford. Me and my ex had 1 parking space (although could fit 2 cars nose to nose if the cars were small).
First one home street parked (as parking spaces were very limited) and the second back got the parking space.
I came back late from work one evening to find no street parking and someone parked in my parking space!! I assumed it was perhaps a friend of my ex so I squeezed my car in behind bumper to bumper blocking them in.
Turns out my ex had no idea whose car it was! Needless to say someone rang my bell later pointing out I'd blocked them in! I told them I was about to have a bath and couldn't come to the door so they'd have to wait! I made them wait over an hour!
I had no idea it was a criminal offence to block someone in on my own driveway, but given it had a great big number on the parking space showing which flat it belonged to, then I figured it wouldn't be too hard for them to work out who to ask.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)3 -
I cannot believe this!
A former work colleague's wife had her mobility scooter stolen. Colleague saw it happen,took photo of thief, took it to police who recognised the well known thief, but did absolutely sweet FA about the theft!!
Yet here we have a police officer taking time out to investigate the matter of a car temporarily blocked in!!!If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales8 -
What did the policeman say when you advised him that the land was your private land?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

