We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Plusnet Number Porting Woes
Comments
-
Who was your previous provider ?
Never associate with idiots on their own level, because, being an intelligent man, you'll try to deal with them on their level - and on their level they'll beat you every time.
Being hated by idiots is the price you pay for not being one of them.
Jean Cocteau 1889-1963
0 -
molerat said:Who was your previous provider ?I was most recently with Vodafone.Prior to that I was with Plusnet (and never experienced any problems with them.)
Prior to that I was with Virgin.I've had the same number for over 30 years. Porting it was never an issue all the previous times I have switched provider.0 -
So you previously had the same number with Plusnet , so obviously it’s technically possible after all you are in effect going back to previous setup , but ( unfortunately ) the port request needs to be done at the initial order stage ( when you signed up to PN and asked for the number to be retained from your what was then your current provider, VF ) , by processing an order with any old PN number and then retrospectively asking VF for your number , it’s likely that by now , the number has been returned to the original number range holder ( presumably Virgin ) and getting the number onto PN would require VM to become involved and they obviously have no incentive to do anything, after all you are not a VM customer .
Thats not to say it’s impossible, it could take someone that knows how to deal with porting requests that don’t adhere to the normal process, but I wouldn’t get my hopes up.
Did you click the box stating to retain the number when ordering with PN ?, they do have a disclaimer that they make best efforts, but didn’t guarantee the previous number will be available , if they cannot get the number and you did tick the appropriate box ( therefore it’s PN’s ‘fault’ , you could get some compensation if they simply state the number has gone for good….in that scenario joining VM ( if the number is of such importance ) would be the only real option , and even then , they may stop short of promises that you can have that number0 -
As I said, there was never any information given about keeping my old number during the initial sign up stage. No question asked. No boxes to tick. Nothing.I was notably aware of the absence of this because I have switched a few times previously. I nevertheless went ahead with the order because I never expected it to be a problem given that it never had been previously - and as you've stated, I even had the number with Plusnet just a couple of years ago.As it turns out, they have actually responded to my Resolver case, albeit through the message page on my Plusnet account rather than through Resolver. I'm not quite sure why they did that because I was never given any notification of these messages, and it was only by chance that I happened to spot it.Anyway - they initially said much the same as you, that the number had been returned to Virgin and that they would make a request for it. A few days later they follwed up with the information that the request has been rejected because Virgin don't have it. They're now claiming BT PSTN has it.It's becoming farcical.
0 -
Yet another simple task the providers can't manage to get right and the useless regulator does nothing about. It should be a simple case of the number is ported unless a request is made to the contrary.
Never associate with idiots on their own level, because, being an intelligent man, you'll try to deal with them on their level - and on their level they'll beat you every time.
Being hated by idiots is the price you pay for not being one of them.
Jean Cocteau 1889-1963
0 -
The only way BT could have the number is if , back in the day, the number was ported to VM from BT , you can check if BT are the number range holder on the Ofcom website site , if you have had the phone number for 30 years this is right at the time the cable industry were building out their network, back then number port was a device they used frequently to get customers to switch from BT , arguably keeping the phone number was much more important than it is now , being the only way most people kept in-touch with others , ( mobiles , email etc were very rare ) so keeping the number was in many cases the only way people would consider switching …is it possible the number was BT first ?
0 -
I'm not knowledgeable enough to be able to answer that. It's never been a BT number in all the time that I've had it.iniltous said:…is it possible the number was BT first ?
I acquired it when I first switched to NTL, which later became Virgin.I was under the impression that Plusnet was owned by BT
0 -
If you post your STD code and first 3 digits ( for example 01325 348*** ) that should be sufficient to check who the number range holder is, NTL would have had their own number range , but when they were first available ( as stated ) would have signed up many ex BT customers , that ported their BT numbers into NTL….if someone just went with NTL from scratch or wasn’t bothered about keeping an existing number they would have been given an NTL number from NTLs own number range.
PN are part of BT Group , and can provide service in the same way as BT themselves, but also have their own number ranges in some areas .0 -
I just did a check and it says that Virgin Media is the range holder.According to the messages I received from Plusnet, the number is "not with Virgin" and " is already ported to BT."I really have no idea what is going on. They've said they'll get back to me on Monday.
0 -
BT ( Consumer ) don’t have any involvement, so that’s BS , but , if PN are in effect using a BTw /WLR BT ( wholesale line rental ) line , then ‘BT’ as in BTw ( not BT Consumer division ) could be the ‘network’ provider than Plusnet use in your area, if that the case then the PN order should be associated with the port of the VM number and if VM state that the number is ported , PN should be the recipient , but VM or PN shouldn’t be referring to ‘BT’ as that will only cause confusion….0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
