We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Flue needed for new log burner?
katymayo
Posts: 19 Forumite
I'm thinking of getting a log burner installed in my living room, I currently have an open fire which is in use & no flue lining. I have had quotes from 2 company's, the first wanted £520 for 9m 316 flue lining. The other company I went to said 'why do you want flue lining? you don't need one if your fire is in working order'
So now I'm confused £520 seems a hell of a lot of money for a liner, so do I bother or not?
So now I'm confused £520 seems a hell of a lot of money for a liner, so do I bother or not?
0
Comments
-
Are they both Hetas registered? Did they carry out any form of smoke/draw test on your chimney?
How old is your house? Are you SURE your flue doesn't have a pottery lining? If your stack really does not have ANY lining, then I think a new flue liner would be a good call. If your flue does have a pottery liner in good condition, then I guess there's no reason why it ain't good to go (as long as a Hetas says so).
So, a bit more info, please, if you have it.0 -
You don't need a flu to meet the regs, but it's generally accepted that it's better to do so.
If you don't have a flu then you'll also need to either have a hatch or make the plate removable so that you can clean out all the crud that falls down (and for sweeping).
You also won't need to worry about gappy brickwork letting fumes through the wall at some point.
I'd get a flu. In fact I did when I was in the same situation with a working open fire.0 -
Wood burners are generally more efficient with the correct sized flue. Most flues that aren't lined are about 9x9 inches, and with clay liners about 8x8 inches. S/S liners are smaller than that to suit the burner.
You can have a burner without an S/S liner, but the fitter would have to test the flue and fit a register plate. Most HETAS fitters prefer to fit a liner.2 -
katymayo said: I have had quotes from 2 company's, the first wanted £520 for 9m 316 flue lining.I'd recommend a 904/904 double skin stainless steel liner of a size recommended by the stove manufacturer. A 904/904 liner will last a lot longer than a 316/316 or even a 904/316 liner. You'll also get a better draw on the fire and you won't have to worry about cracks in your existing flue leaking Carbon Monoxide (that is CO, bot CO2) in to bedrooms.Oh, and if you ever plan to burn smokeless coal, you will need a 904/904 liner.One thing to consider before purchasing a stove - Do you have sufficient space to store wood under cover ?Don't under estimate the amount of fuel you can get through each winter - I have a 10x6 shed crammed full of logs, and it will just about last one winter. There is also a comparable quantity stacked on pallets & under a tarpaulin ready for the following year.Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
