Code of practice

Jenni_D

So which company does this PPC troll (the OP) represent then?  

Madcoupon

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

patient_dream

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You probably mean a "summer recession" where government would not dare loading peope, millions of them, with scam cloud dreaming debt collector fake charges

With the summer recess ending and back to business in the house, if Boris is lucky, it will all about him 
Whatever happens, the next agenda must be why both ATA's have held the motorist in contempt for many years and why they promoted the scam and lost control

All parking companies must get used to the idea that with the new code practice and the banning of fakes

Debt collectors involved must look for a new market place and given their low life attitude it could be little old ladies

No doubt debt collectors will still try it on with their rubbish. The two famous rogues operate under the umbrella of the BPA WHO ARE THE KEY.
THE KEY MUST BE TAKEN AWAY BY GOVERNMENT

AnotherForumite

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You were almost right, how things will pan out now is uncertain; but it’s a step in the right direction to retain an element of justice for landowners rights.

Umkomaas

What % of the 8.4 million tickets issued was for truly abusing 'landowner rights', like fly parking without payment for hours on end, leaving the vehicle while catching a train to go to work for the day?

Do you truly believe that a few minutes overstay is really abusing landowner rights?

And what about targeting cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment because of all patients, they are the ones likely to be delayed leaving the hospital - still 'protecting landowner rights'?

Where is the concern for landowner rights when PPCs routinely ticket, refuse appeals, sue in their own name, those occupants of their own freehold property (ie, the very landowners purported to be 'protected')?

I'm afraid 'protecting landowner rights' has become a veneer in a pretty thin attempt to make this all sound reasonable. 

Grizebeck

AnotherForumite said:

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You were almost right, how things will pan out now is uncertain; but it’s a step in the right direction to retain an element of justice for landowners rights.

Parking firms are not interested in landowner rights they are only in it for themselves. Its a falsehood to state that and you ( and the parking industry knows it) 

Jenni_D

Grizebeck said:

AnotherForumite said:

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You were almost right, how things will pan out now is uncertain; but it’s a step in the right direction to retain an element of justice for landowners rights.

Parking firms are not interested in landowner rights they are only in it for themselves. Its a falsehood to state that and you ( and the parking industry knows it) 

In case you didn't realise it ... AF is (part of) the parking industry.  

Fruitcake

AnotherForumite said:

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You were almost right, how things will pan out now is uncertain; but it’s a step in the right direction to retain an element of justice for landowners rights.

How will landowners rights be improved if the government allows fake add on debt collection charges that have been made up by the parking industry, and not actually incurred by the PPC?

Umkomaas

Looks like the Daily Mail is first out of the blocks on this. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10883025/Private-car-park-firms-branded-bullies-bid-block-cutting-maximum-fines-100-50.html

Half_way

AnotherForumite said:

Madcoupon said:

Maybe I have mis-read things? Let’s see if there’s anything after summer recess. 

You were almost right, how things will pan out now is uncertain; but it’s a step in the right direction to retain an element of justice for landowners rights.

Parking companies have zero interest in landowners rights .

 If they did then we wouldnt see such things as own space incidents where some scumbag parking company tries to scam the landowner for using their own land that is not protecting landowner rights its the exact opposite.

Same again with ANPR systems that are not fit for purpose if the parking industry was fit for purpose then  we would see no ANPR issues at all double dips would no happen as there would be  boots on the ground to check that the automated data was/is correct , and so called miss key errors would be impossible as they system should not allow for incorrect reg plates to be entered.

 Overstay for a ridiculous fee would also be eliminated with pay on exit and barrier control where an operator would sit in a cabin to monitor things on site, and any overstay fee would be a reasonable amount for parking and not the punitive £100

The parking industry is greedy and is run and staffed by greedy scum