they are scum bags , ive sent them the proof of no fault claim and they disputed the wording .. apparantly " not responsible" isnt the same as "non fault".
In insurance terms a fault claim means the insurance has had to pay out on that claim. It doesn't mean the person who's policy it is actually caused the incident. This is true for all insurers.
they are scum bags , ive sent them the proof of no fault claim and they disputed the wording .. apparantly " not responsible" isnt the same as "non fault".
It is not the same. Fault and non-fault are the recognised terms for whether your insurer had liability or not. (i.e. did your insurer cover the costs or did the other party's insurer).
It is possible to have a claim showing you were not responsible but still at fault.
Not sure how that makes them scumbags.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
Replies
It is possible to have a claim showing you were not responsible but still at fault.
Not sure how that makes them scumbags.