We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Architect or Builder issue? with planning enforcement issue? Any help welcome.
Comments
-
The 'architect' is actually an architectural technician and is self employed and has her own insurance.0
-
I'm curious about something here. I've got a few questions:
1) I suspect that I, as a complete amateur could complete architectural drawings for a friend if they wanted me to and I was happy to. If there was an issue with those drawings could I be held liable, or would the fact it was unpaid, as a favour and done by an amateur void any liability?
2) If the answer to the above is there's no liability could a professional ever complete work as a favour, outside of their business and deny liability or does their professional status mean they're always acting in a professional capacity? Does this change if the individual doesn't work for themselves and therefore there's a clear distinction between their 'professional work' and other work they do for free outside of this?
I'm wondering if it's possible for the architect to say they weren't acting in a professional capacity, just helping out a friend and use this to avoid any liability.0 -
Although people use the word pretty freely in conversation, the title "architect" actually is legally protected, and can only be used by people who are professionally qualified and registered as architects.
Other related titles like "architectural designer", "architectural consultant" don't have the same status.
See here: https://arb.org.uk/public-information/before-hiring-an-architect/who-can-use-the-title-architect/0 -
I doubt the architect could use this as a get-out. Medically qualified persons are expected to act appropriately if they happen across an injured person in the street, even if they're off duty. I've also been told that e.g. a civil engineer could be held to have a professional duty to intervene if they were walking down the street and saw someone carrying out construction work in a seriously unsafe fashion.Gavin83 said:I'm wondering if it's possible for the architect to say they weren't acting in a professional capacity, just helping out a friend and use this to avoid any liability.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
